Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-Specific Blood Pressure Estimation Using Elastography-Integrated Arterial Tonometry: Design, Development, and Experimental Evaluation in a Phantom Model.

Journal of medical devices·2026
Same author

Weight Loss at a Cost-Sense and Sensibility.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same author

Alternative Follow-Up Regimen for Methotrexate Treatment.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Intraoperative visual evoked potentials and electroretinographic monitoring during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.

Brain & spine·2026
Same author

Ectopic Pleomorphic Adenoma: A Case Study and Scoping Review of the Literature.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Guillain-Barré syndrome clinical characteristics and outcomes among U.S. active component service members, 2014-2022.

MSMR·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

3.3K

Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Programming: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Alex W Yang1, Katie F Lee1, Michael Noller2

  • 1School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [And] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
|August 16, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Image-guided cochlear implant programming (IGCIP) shows potential for precise CI programming. While objective measures showed nominal benefits, most patients preferred their IGCIP map, indicating subjective improvements.

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

469
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

534

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

3.3K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

469
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

534

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Cochlear implant (CI) programming aims to optimize auditory perception.
  • Image-guided cochlear implant programming (IGCIP) is a novel technique utilizing imaging to refine CI fitting.
  • Evaluating the clinical efficacy of IGCIP is crucial for its adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review studies on clinically implemented IGCIP.
  • To assess the impact of IGCIP on cochlear implant performance.
  • To compare patient outcomes between IGCIP and traditional programming methods.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar.
  • Included studies prospectively compared intraindividual CI performance using IGCIP versus traditional maps.
  • Meta-analysis was performed on data from five studies, analyzing speech, spectral, and quality-of-life outcomes.

Main Results:

  • IGCIP demonstrated nominal effect sizes for objective measures like speech recognition in quiet and noise.
  • Subjective outcomes, such as the Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, also showed modest improvements.
  • A significant majority (79%) of patients preferred to continue using their IGCIP map post-study.

Conclusions:

  • IGCIP offers a precise approach to cochlear implant programming.
  • Objective audiological outcomes may not fully capture the subjective benefits experienced by patients.
  • The high rate of patient preference for IGCIP maps suggests significant, albeit potentially subtle, functional advantages.