Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

06:39
Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
15.1K
Sex differences in machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve
Mahmoud Al Rifai1, Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed1, Yushui Han1
1Houston Methodist Debakey Heart & Vascular Center, 6550 Fannin Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Scientific Reports
|August 16, 2022
Summary
Machine learning fractional flow reserve (ML-FFRCT) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) shows no sex-based differences in predicting cardiovascular outcomes. This study found ML-FFRCT values were higher in women, but its association with death or myocardial infarction was similar between sexes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is crucial for diagnosing coronary artery disease.
- Machine learning fractional flow reserve (ML-FFRCT) offers a non-invasive method to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses.
- Understanding sex-based differences in cardiovascular risk assessment is vital for personalized medicine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential sex differences in the association between ML-FFRCT and incident cardiovascular outcomes.
- To compare ML-FFRCT values and their prognostic implications in men and women with suspected coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study included 471 patients undergoing CCTA and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
- ML-FFRCT was calculated using a machine learning algorithm, with ML-FFRCT < 0.8 defining significant stenosis.
- The primary outcome was a composite of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (D/MI), analyzed using multivariable adjusted models.
Main Results:
- Women had less obstructive stenosis by CCTA (9% vs. 18%) and a higher median ML-FFRCT (0.76 vs. 0.71) compared to men.
- The prevalence of significant stenosis (ML-FFRCT < 0.8) was similar between sexes (39% vs. 44%).
- Multivariable analysis revealed no significant association between ML-FFRCT < 0.8 and D/MI, with no significant interaction detected for sex.
Conclusions:
- In symptomatic patients undergoing CCTA and SPECT, ML-FFRCT values were higher in women than men.
- ML-FFRCT did not show a significant association with incident death or myocardial infarction in this cohort.
- The prognostic value of ML-FFRCT for cardiovascular events does not appear to differ significantly between men and women.

