Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Cognition in Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial
Myoung-Hwan Ko1,2,3, Ju-Yul Yoon1,2, Yun-Ju Jo3
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (M.-H.K., J.-Y.Y., D.-S.K., G.-W.K., Y.H.W., S.-H.P., J.-H.S.).
Background:
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool for improving poststroke cognitive function. Home-based rehabilitation is increasingly required for patients with stroke, and additional benefits are expected if supplemented with remotely supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS). We evaluated the cognitive improvement effect and feasibility of RS-tDCS in patients with chronic stroke.
Methods:
Twenty-six patients with chronic stroke and cognitive impairment (Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [K-MoCA] score <26) were randomized into real and sham RS-tDCS groups and underwent concurrent computerized cognitive training and RS-tDCS. Patients and caregivers underwent training to ensure correct tDCS self-application, were monitored, and treated 5 d/wk for 4 weeks. We investigated several cognition tests including K-MoCA, Korean version of the Dementia Rating Scale-2, Korean-Boston Naming Test, Trail Making Test, Go/No Go, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test at the end of the training sessions and one month later. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for comparison between the groups and within each group. The adherence rate of the appropriate RS-tDCS session was also investigated.
Results:
In within-group comparison, unlike the sham group, the real group showed significant improvement in K-MoCA (Preal=0.004 versus Psham=0.132), particularly in patients with lower baseline K-MoCA (K-MoCA10-17; Preal=0.001 versus Psham=0.835, K-MoCA18-25; Preal=0.060 versus Psham=0.064) or with left hemispheric lesions (left; Preal=0.010 versus Psham=0.454, right; Preal=0.106 versus Psham=0.128). In between-group comparison, a significant difference was observed in K-MoCA in the lower baseline K-MoCA subgroup (K-MoCA10-17; Ptime×group=0.048), but no significant difference was found in other cognitive tests. The adherence rate of successful application of the RS-tDCS was 98.4%, and no serious adverse effects were detected.
Conclusions:
RS-tDCS is a safe and feasible rehabilitation modality for poststroke cognitive dysfunction. Specifically, RS-tDCS is effective in patients with moderate cognitive decline. Additionally, these data demonstrate the potential to enhance home-based cognitive training, although significant differences were not consistently found in between-group comparisons; therefore, further larger studies are needed.
Registration:
URL: https://cris.nih.go.kr; Unique identifier: KCT0003427.
