Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025
A Swin Transformer-Based Model for Thyroid Nodule Detection in Ultrasound Images
Published on: April 21, 2023
Diagnostic performance of the 2021 Korean thyroid imaging reporting and data system in pediatric thyroid nodules
Pyeong Hwa Kim1, Hee Mang Yoon2, Jung Hwan Baek3
1Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Objectives:
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 2021 K-TIRADS biopsy criteria for detecting malignant thyroid nodules in a pediatric population, making comparisons with 2016 K-TIRADS.
Methods:
This retrospective study included pediatric patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses. The diagnostic performance of 2021 K-TIRADS was compared with that of 2016 K-TIRADS. Simulation studies were performed by changing biopsy cut-off sizes for K-TIRADS 5 to 1.0 cm (K-TIRADS5-1.0cm) and 0.5 cm (K-TIRADS5-0.5cm), and for K-TIRADS 4 to 1.0 cm (K-TIRADS4-1.0cm) and 1.0-1.5 cm (K-TIRADS4-1.0~1.5cm). Subgroup analysis was performed in small (< 1.5 cm) and large nodules (≥ 1.5 cm).
Results:
Two hundred seventy-seven thyroid nodules (54.9% malignant) from 221 pediatric patients were analyzed. All simulated 2021 K-TIRADS showed higher accuracy than 2016 K-TIRADS. Compared with 2021 K-TIRADS5-1.0cm, 2021 K-TIRADS5-0.5cm showed lower specificity (51.6% vs. 47.9%; p = 0.004) but higher sensitivity (77.2% vs. 90.3%; p < 0.001) and accuracy (62.7% vs. 68.9%; p < 0.001). Compared with 2021 K-TIRADS4-1.0cm, 2021 K-TIRADS4-1.0~1.5cm showed higher specificity (44.9% vs. 47.9%; p = 0.018) without significant difference in other diagnostic measures. Compared with 2016 K-TIRADS, 2021 K-TIRADS (biopsy cut-offs, 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5; 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4) showed higher sensitivity (34.0% vs. 67.3%; p < 0.001) while maintaining specificity (89.4% vs. 88.2%; p = 0.790) in small nodules, and higher specificity (5.9% vs. 25.4%; p < 0.001) while maintaining sensitivity (100% vs. 98.7%; p = 0.132) in large nodules.
Conclusions:
In pediatric patients, 2021 K-TIRADS showed superior diagnostic accuracy to 2016 K-TIRADS, especially with a biopsy cut-off of 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5 and 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4.
Key Points:
• All simulated 2021 K-TIRADS showed higher accuracy than 2016 K-TIRADS. • 2021 K-TIRADS with cut-off size for K-TIRADS 5 of 0.5 cm showed lower specificity but higher sensitivity and accuracy than that of 1.0 cm. • Compared with 2016 K-TIRADS, 2021 K-TIRADS (biopsy cut-offs, 0.5 cm for K-TIRADS 5; 1.0-1.5 cm for K-TIRADS 4) showed higher sensitivity while maintaining specificity in small nodules, and higher specificity while maintaining sensitivity in large nodules.
