Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
How Should Clinicians Respond to Race-Based Algorithms as Sources of Iatrogenic Harm?
Madeleine Maddy Kane1, Rachel Bervell2, Angela Y Zhang3
1Medical student in the UC Berkeley-UC San Francisco Joint Medical Program and a co-founder of the Institute of Healing and Justice in Medicine.
Abstract:
Some clinical algorithms use race as an epidemiological shorthand to "correct" for health determinants that are clinically influential but also variable because they are historical, social, cultural, or economic in origin. Such "correction factors" are both clinically and ethically relevant when their use reinforces racial essentialism and exacerbates racial health inequity. This commentary on a case in which the original vaginal birth after cesarean calculator is used argues that this and similar race-based algorithms should be considered sources of iatrogenic harm by undermining decision sharing in patient-clinician relationships and Black birthing peoples' rights to self-determination.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Blinding
Ethical Dilemmas II
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

