Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A reference scale method for constructing neuropsychological test batteries.

E W Russell

    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
    |August 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    In defense of the Halstead Reitan Battery: a critique of Lezak's review.

    Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
    Same author

    Toward an explanation of Dodrill's observation: high neuropsychological test performance does not accompany high IQs.

    The Clinical neuropsychologist·2002
    Same author

    A partial cross-validation of a Halstead-Reitan Battery malingering formula.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·1997
    Same author

    Detection of malingering on the Halstead-Reitan Battery: a cross-validation.

    Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·1997
    Same author

    The accuracy of automated and clinical detection of brain damage and lateralization in neuropsychology.

    Neuropsychology review·1995
    Same author

    Neuropsychological test patterns in men for Alzheimer's and multi-infarct dementia.

    Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·1993
    Same journal

    Assessment of facial emotion recognition accuracy and reaction time in patients with social anxiety disorder diagnosed with performance-only specifier.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2026
    Same journal

    Stability and accuracy of specific learning disability diagnoses from childhood to young adulthood.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2026
    Same journal

    Performance validity test failure rates among neuropsychological outpatients clinically referred for persistent Long COVID cognitive symptoms following mild SARS-CoV-2 disease severity.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2026
    Same journal

    Correction.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2026
    Same journal

    A 50-year personal odyssey through the story of learning disabilities: from primary school to adult LD diagnoses.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2026
    Same journal

    The gut-brain axis in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases: a systematic review of microbiota-derived biomarkers and novel therapeutic approaches.

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2026
    See all related articles

    Neuropsychological test scaling requires understanding test parameters. This study found significant variability in brain-damaged subjects

    Area of Science:

    • Neuropsychology
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Scaling of neuropsychological test variables necessitates understanding of test parameters.
    • The Rennick Index of the Halstead-Reitan Battery is a commonly used neuropsychological assessment tool.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the scaling parameters for 12 tests within the Rennick Index of the Halstead-Reitan Battery.
    • To evaluate the applicability of z and T scores for brain-damaged populations.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized data from 732 subjects to plot z-score distributions for 12 tests.
    • Employed linear regression prediction for constructing scaled scores.

    Main Results:

    • Observed significant variability in test distributions for brain-damaged subjects compared to controls.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Maximum z-scores ranged from 3.8 to 27.3, with highly variable distribution forms (normal to skewed).
  • Identified that identical z-scores indicate varying degrees of impairment across different tests.

    • Conclusions:

    • Standard z and T scores may not be reliably applicable to brain-damaged populations due to significant score variability.
    • Developed a method for constructing scaled scores that indicate equal amounts of impairment, enhancing clinical utility.