Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

2.2K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
2.2K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

7.1K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.1K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.8K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.8K
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

40.5K
Overview
40.5K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.4K
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.3K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Panoramic contamination profiling and dietary exposure risk of plant growth regulators in medicinal and edible plants: A data modeling-driven MMSPE-UPLC-MS/MS platform.

Journal of hazardous materials·2025
Same author

ChromNet: A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Cross-Cell Type Prediction of 3D Chromatin Interactions Using Epigenetic Signals.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Methylation reference datasets from quartet DNA materials for benchmarking epigenome sequencing.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Mechanisms and performance evaluation of oily sludge biodegradability enhanced by hydrothermal treatment.

Bioresource technology·2025
Same author

8-epi-Helenalin suppresses tumorigenesis and metastasis by modulating the STAT3/FAK signaling axis.

European journal of pharmacology·2025
Same author

diPaRIS: Dynamic and Interpretable Protein-RNA Interactions Prediction With U-Shaped Network and Novel Structure Encoding.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025
Same journal

Cross-Domain Transfer Learning from Peptides to Metabolites Using a Multi-Property Fine-Tuned LLM.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

TEDLH: Domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

PLNFGL: Joint Estimation of Multi-Condition Gene Networks from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.2K

Fec: a fast error correction method based on two-rounds overlapping and caching.

Jun Zhang1,2, Fan Nie1,2, Neng Huang1,2

  • 1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|August 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new tool, Fec, speeds up genome analysis by efficiently correcting errors in long reads from third-generation sequencing technologies. It reuses alignment data, significantly reducing processing time for high-coverage datasets.

More Related Videos

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.7K
Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.2K
Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.7K
Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Third-generation sequencing technologies provide long reads essential for genome analysis.
  • High error rates in these long reads necessitate computationally intensive error correction.
  • Existing error correction methods often perform redundant base-level alignments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a fast and efficient error correction tool for long sequencing reads.
  • To reduce the computational cost associated with error correction in high-coverage datasets.
  • To improve the speed of genome assembly pipelines by optimizing the error correction step.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced Fec, a novel error correction tool utilizing two-round overlapping and a caching mechanism.
  • Employed a large window size in the first round for rapid initial overlap detection and correction.
  • Utilized a small window size in the second round to refine corrections for reads with insufficient overlaps, reusing cached alignment data to avoid redundant computations.

Main Results:

  • Fec demonstrated significant speed-ups across multiple datasets.
  • Achieved 1.24-38.56 times speed-up compared to MECAT, CANU, and MINICNS on PacBio datasets.
  • Achieved 1.16-27.8 times speed-up compared to NECAT and CANU on nanopore datasets.

Conclusions:

  • Fec offers a substantial performance improvement for long-read error correction.
  • The caching strategy effectively reuses alignment information, reducing computational overhead.
  • Fec can be integrated into assembly pipelines or used as a standalone tool for efficient genome analysis.