Feasibility, Efficiency, and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Catheter Interventions for Right-Sided Cardiac Arrhythmias...

Fluoroscopy is traditionally used for catheter interventions in electrophysiology but carries a long-term health risk. Besides additional invasive procedures to achieve zero-fluoroscopy (ZF) interventions, electroanatomic mapping may be an alternative to fluoroscopy without the need of additional procedures. We aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficiency of a ZF approach using only electroanatomic mapping (ZF) compared to a conventional fluoroscopic (CF) approach for patients with right sided cardiac arrhythmias.

We performed a single centre retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing catheter interventions for electrophysiologic procedures from January 2019 to December 2020. Patients with left-sided arrhythmias, focal cryoablation, implanted endocardial devices, or additional interventions requiring fluoroscopy were excluded.

202 patients underwent a ZF and 126 patients underwent a CF approach for right-sided cardiac arrhythmias. Apart from atrial fibrillation (ZF 16% vs. CF 9%, p = 0.044), baseline demographics were similar in both groups. Acute success rate was 100% in the ZF group and 97.9% in the CF group. Mean procedure time was lower in the ZF group (70 ± 36 vs. 87 ± 44 min, p = 0.0001), while ablation time (356 ± 324 vs. 320 ± 294 s, p = 0.157) was similar. Total complication rate was low in general (1.0 % major, 2% minor complications) and without a difference between both groups.

A ZF approach using only electroanatomic mapping without additional invasive procedures to diagnose and treat right-sided cardiac arrhythmias is feasible, efficient, and safe.