Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Is MDCT an accurate tool to differentiate between benign and malignant etiology in diffuse peritoneal disease?
Shyjumon George1, Kirthi Sathyakumar1, Mandeep Singh Bindra2
1Department of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, Tamil Nadu, India.
Purpose:
There is often considerable overlap of imaging findings in benign and malignant peritoneal diseases. We evaluated patients with diffuse peritoneal disease, to assess the diagnostic value of MDCT in predicting benign or malignant etiology in patients with unknown etiology, by analyzing the various patterns of involvement, particularly tuberculosis (TB) vs malignancy.
Methods:
One hundred and thirty-six patients with diffuse peritoneal disease who had abdominal CT and subsequently underwent omental biopsies were included in the study. Peritoneal, mesenteric and omental involvement by disease was evaluated on CT using specific parameters. The presence of lymphadenopathy, ascites, scalloping of organs, involvement of liver and spleen, were also compared between benign and malignant conditions using histopathology as the gold standard.
Results:
In 136 patients, 72 benign and 64 malignant pathologies were classified as per histopathology. Higher age (p < 0.001), increasing omental thickness (mean 25.2 mm, p = 0.004), omental caking (p < 0.001), > 10 mm mesenteric/peritoneal nodules (p < 0.03), visceral scalloping (p = 0.001), free ascites (p = 0.003), serosal involvement (p = 0.004) and bilateral pleural effusion (p = 0.02) were associated with malignant etiology. Mesenteric thickening/stranding (p = 0.02), mesenteric adenopathy (p < 0.001), necrotic nodes (p = 0.02), splenomegaly (p = < 0.001) and higher attenuation (> 20HU) of ascitic fluid (p < 0.001) were associated with benign etiology. The presence of mesenteric thickening or stranding (p = 0.01), splenomegaly (p = 0.02), higher ascitic fluid attenuation > 20HU (p = < 0.01), mesenteric adenopathy (p < 0.01), necrotic nodes (p = 0.03) favored tuberculosis. CT had diagnostic accuracy (79.3, 86.7%), sensitivity (79.2, 74.6%) and specificity (79.4, 97%) for observers 1 and 2, respectively (Kappa 0.713).
Conclusion:
Contrast-enhanced MDCT has good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant etiologies of diffuse peritoneal disease. Multiple common parameters can be used to differentiate between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis.
More Related Videos
09:31In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
07:20Intraoperative Detection of Subtle Endometriosis: A Novel Paradigm for Detection and Treatment of Pelvic Pain Associated with the Loss of Peritoneal Integrity
Published on: December 21, 2012