Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

190
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
190
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.8K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.8K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

163
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
163
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

1.2K
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antipsychotic Drugs and the Risk of Diabetic Complications: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Understanding how adverse childhood experiences influence the development of postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder: a qualitative study in China.

European journal of psychotraumatology·2026
Same author

Antipsychotic Drugs and the Risk of Diabetic Complications: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Effects of vaginal microbiota transfer on social-emotional and neurodevelopment in cesarean-born infants: 12-month follow-up of a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

Self-perceived mental health among Canadian adolescents and young adults with asthma: Insights from a national cross-sectional study.

The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma·2026
Same author

Trends in Antipsychotic Drug Use in the United States, 2000-2016.

Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 1, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Principles of risk decision-making.

Daniel Krewski1, Patrick Saunders-Hastings1, Patricia Larkin1

  • 1McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part B, Critical Reviews
|August 18, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Public health risk management involves complex factors. This review proposes 10 principles for decision-making, acknowledging potential conflicts and the need for expert judgment in applying them to diverse risks.

Keywords:
Risk sciencedecision theoryrisk contextrisk decision-makingrisk management

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 1, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Risk Management
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Public health risk management involves navigating complex and conflicting factors.
  • Effective decision-making requires a structured approach to managing diverse risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a framework of 10 fundamental principles for guiding public health risk management decisions.
  • To explore the practical applicability and contextual relevance of these principles.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of existing principles in risk management.
  • Conceptual analysis of 10 diverse risk issues to evaluate principle applicability.

Main Results:

  • Identified 10 core principles for risk decision-making.
  • Highlighted potential conflicts between principles (e.g., precautionary vs. risk-based).
  • Emphasized the need for context-specific application and expert judgment.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed principles offer substantive insight into risk management decision-making.
  • Decision-makers must exercise judgment, considering scientific and extra-scientific factors.
  • No single principle universally applies; context dictates the most appropriate approach.