Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe
Published on: December 4, 2016
China 6 moving average window method for real driving emission evaluation: Challenges, causes, and impacts
Yachao Wang1, Hang Yin2, Junfang Wang2
1National Laboratory of Automotive Performance & Emission Test, School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
The China 6 real driving emission (RDE) calculation using the moving average window (MAW) method often underestimates results, potentially weakening test supervision. Analysis reveals data exclusion and extended factors significantly impact MAW calculations, requiring simultaneous consideration for accurate emission assessments.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Automotive Engineering
- Regulatory Compliance
Background:
- The China 6 real driving emission (RDE) calculation employs a complex light-duty moving average window (MAW) method with various boundaries.
- Previous studies indicated potential underestimation by the MAW method, but systematic analysis of the causes was lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively analyze the underestimation problem, its causes, and impacts within the light-duty MAW method for China 6 RDE.
- To propose and utilize the instantaneous utilization factor (IUF) for a deeper understanding of MAW calculation dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Conducted real-world driving tests with 29 vehicles across 10 cities.
- Applied different calculation boundaries and analyzed data exclusion and extended factors.
- Introduced and employed the instantaneous utilization factor (IUF) for cause analysis.
Main Results:
- Over 75% of tests showed underestimation by the MAW method, with some reaching 100%.
- Data exclusion was found to cause biased MAW results; removing extended factors significantly reduced bias.
- MAW method leads to lower IUF at test start/end, particularly concerning when cold-start data is included.
Conclusions:
- The coupled effects of data exclusion, extended factors, and window characteristics necessitate simultaneous consideration for method improvement.
- The current drift-check process is insufficient for monitoring portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) during tests.
- Inaccurate MAW results can lead to implausible emission limits, inventories, and policies.

