Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
Qun Zhang1,2,3, Hengshan Huan1,4, Yu Han1,2,3
1Department of Emergency and Chest Pain Center, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Insights
Simple stenting strategies for coronary bifurcation lesions significantly reduce long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). This meta-analysis found simple strategies to be superior to complex ones over a 5-year period.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease treatment involves stent placement, particularly for challenging bifurcation lesions.
- Both simple and complex stenting techniques exist, but their comparative long-term efficacy is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of simple versus complex stenting strategies in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 2494 patients.
- Included trials were identified through comprehensive searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
- Outcomes were assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years, with major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) as the primary endpoint.
Main Results:
- The simple stenting strategy showed a trend towards lower MACEs at 1 year (OR 0.61, P=.08).
- A statistically significant reduction in MACEs was observed at 5 years with the simple strategy compared to the complex strategy (OR 0.69, P=.01).
- No significant heterogeneity was detected across the included studies (I²=0% for all time points).
Conclusions:
- The simple stenting strategy is associated with a lower incidence of long-term major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.
- This finding suggests that simpler approaches may offer superior long-term prognosis for this patient population.
Background:
Stent placement remains a challenge for coronary bifurcation lesions. While both simple and complex stenting strategies are available, it is unclear which one results in better clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to explore the long-term prognosis following treatment with the 2 stenting strategies.
Method:
Randomized controlled trials found from searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were included in this meta-analysis. The complex stent placement strategy was identified as the control group, and the simple stent placement strategy was identified as the experimental group. Data were synthesized with a random effects model. The quality of the randomized controlled trials was assessed by Jadad scale scores. The clinical endpoints at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years were analyzed.
Results:
A total of 11 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2494 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The odds ratio [OR] of the major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 6 months was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.35; P = .49, I 2 = 0%). The OR of the MACEs at 1 year was 0.61 (95% CI 0.36-1.05; P = .08, I 2 = 0%). The OR of the MACEs at 5 years was 0.69 (95% CI 0.51-0.92; P = .01, I 2 = 0%). Compared with the complex strategy, the simple strategy was associated with a lower incidence of MACEs at 5 years.
Conclusion:
Compared to the complex stenting strategy, the simple stenting strategy can better reduce the occurrence of long-term MACEs for coronary bifurcation lesions.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

