Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Socioeconomic inequalities in health status and survival: a cohort study in Rome
Luca Dei Bardi1,2, Enrico Calandrini3, Anna Maria Bargagli3
1Department of Epidemiology - Regional Health Service, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy l.deibardi@deplazio.it.
Objectives:
To analyse the association between individual and contextual socioeconomic position (SEP) with health status and to investigate the role of SEP and baseline health status on survival.
Design:
Cross-sectional and cohort study.
Setting:
Rome, Italy.
Participants, Primary And Secondary Outcomes:
We selected the 25-99 year-olds included in the Rome 2011 census cohort. As a measure of health status on the census reference date (09 October 2011), we used the presence of chronic or rare conditions from the Disease-Related Co-payment Exemption Registry, a database implemented to provide free care to people with chronic or rare diseases. We used logistic regression to analyse the association between both individual (educational attainment) and contextual SEP (neighbourhood real estate price quintiles) with baseline health status. We analysed the role of SEP and the presence of chronic or rare conditions on 5-year survival (until 31 December 2016) using accelerated failure time models with Weibull distribution, reporting time ratios (TRs; 95% CI).
Results:
In middle-aged, subjects with low SEP (either individual or contextual) had a prevalence of chronic conditions comparable with the prevalence in high SEP individuals 10 years older. Adjusted logistic models confirmed the direct association between SEP and baseline health status in both women and men. The lowest educated were up to 67% more likely to have a chronic condition than the highest educated, while the difference was up to 86% for lowest versus highest contextual SEP. Low SEP and the presence of chronic conditions were associated with shorter survival times in both sexes, lowest versus highest educated TR was TR=0.79 for women (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.81) and TR=0.71 for men (95% CI: 0.70 to 0.73). The contextual SEP shrunk survival times by about 10%.
Conclusion:
Inequalities were present in both baseline health and survival. The association between SEP and survival was independent of baseline health status.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Cancer Survival Analysis
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Applications of Life Tables
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

