Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Prediction of post-operative adding-on or compensatory lumbar curve correction after anterior vertebral body
Charlotte Raballand1, Nikita Cobetto1,2, A Noelle Larson3
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Downtown Station, P.O. Box 6079, Montreal, QC, H3C 3A7, Canada.
Purpose:
Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (AVBT), a fusionless surgical technique based on growth modulation, aims to correct pediatric scoliosis over time. However, medium-term curvature changes of the non-instrumented distal lumbar curve remains difficult to predict. The objective was to biomechanically analyze the level below the LIV to evaluate whether adding-on or compensatory lumbar curve after AVBT can be predicted by intervertebral disc (ID) wedging and force asymmetry.
Methods:
33 retrospective scoliotic cases instrumented with AVBT were used to computationally simulate their surgery and 2-year post-operative growth modulation using a finite element model. The cohort was divided into two subgroups according to the lumbar curvature evolution over 2 years: (1) correction > 10° (C); (2) maintaining ± 10° (M). The lumbar Cobb angle and residual ID wedging angle under LIV were measured. Simulated pressures and moments at the superior endplate of LIV + 1 were post-processed. These parameters were correlated at 2 years postoperatively.
Findings:
On average, the LIV + 1 simulated moment was 538 Nmm for subgroup C, 155 Nmm for subgroup M with lumbar Cobb angle > 20° and 34 Nmm for angle < 20° whereas the ID angle was 1° for C and 0° for M.
Interpretation:
On average, a positive moment on the LIV + 1 superior growth plate led to correction of the lumbar curvature, whereas a null moment kept it stable, and a parallel immediate postoperative ID under LIV contributed to its correction or preservation. Nevertheless, the significant interindividual variability suggested that other parameters are involved in the distal non-instrumented curvature evolution.
Level Of Evidence:
IV.
