Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
Published on: February 5, 2014
Treewidth-based algorithms for the small parsimony problem on networks
Celine Scornavacca1, Mathias Weller2
1ISEM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Background:
Phylogenetic reconstruction is one of the paramount challenges of contemporary bioinformatics. A subtask of existing tree reconstruction algorithms is modeled by the SMALL PARSIMONY problem: given a tree T and an assignment of character-states to its leaves, assign states to the internal nodes of T such as to minimize the parsimony score, that is, the number of edges of T connecting nodes with different states. While this problem is polynomial-time solvable on trees, the matter is more complicated if T contains reticulate events such as hybridizations or recombinations, i.e. when T is a network. Indeed, three different versions of the parsimony score on networks have been proposed and each of them is NP-hard to decide. Existing parameterized algorithms focus on combining the number c of possible character-states with the number of reticulate events (per biconnected component).
Results:
We consider the parameter treewidth t of the underlying undirected graph of the input network, presenting dynamic programming algorithms for (slight generalizations of) all three versions of the parsimony problem on size-n networks running in times [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text], respectively. Our algorithms use a formulation of the treewidth that may facilitate formalizing treewidth-based dynamic programming algorithms on phylogenetic networks for other problems.
Conclusions:
Our algorithms allow the computation of the three popular parsimony scores, modeling the evolutionary development of a (multistate) character on a given phylogenetic network of low treewidth. Our results subsume and improve previously known algorithm for all three variants. While our results rely on being given a "good" tree-decomposition of the input, encouraging theoretical results as well as practical implementations producing them are publicly available. We present a reformulation of tree decompositions in terms of "agreeing trees" on the same set of nodes. As this formulation may come more natural to researchers and engineers developing algorithms for phylogenetic networks, we hope to render exploiting the input network's treewidth as parameter more accessible to this audience.
More Related Videos
09:49Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
Published on: September 25, 2021
10:44Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
Published on: December 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Phylogenetic Trees
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Conservation of Small Populations