Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
A Modified Maze Versus Cut-and-Sew Maze for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Concomitant with Mitral
Huishan Wang1, Jinsong Han1, Zengwei Wang1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Insights
A modified maze procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces operating time compared to the standard cut-and-sew maze (CSM) while maintaining similar efficacy in preventing AF recurrence after mitral valve surgery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiac Surgery
- Electrophysiology
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- The standard cut-and-sew maze (CSM) procedure effectively treats persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) during mitral valve surgery.
- CSM's complexity and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass times limit its widespread adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a modified maze procedure combining left atrial "cut-and-sew" with right atrial cryoablation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.
- To compare the early operative outcomes and long-term efficacy of the modified maze with the standard CSM procedure.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 229 patients undergoing CSM and 43 undergoing the modified maze procedure during mitral valve surgery.
- Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) was used to compare outcomes between 43 modified maze patients and 86 CSM patients.
- Atrial fibrillation recurrence rates at 2 years, absence of anti-arrhythmic drug use, and operative times were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The modified maze procedure demonstrated significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp times (76.3 vs. 92.4 minutes, p<0.001).
- No significant difference in early mortality (0% vs. 1.1%, p=0.722) or late strokes/deaths was observed between groups.
- Both procedures showed similar rates of freedom from AF recurrence without anti-arrhythmic drugs at 2 years (p=0.332).
Conclusions:
- The modified maze procedure simplifies the "cut-and-sew" technique and reduces operative time.
- This approach maintains the high efficacy of CSM for eliminating persistent AF in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.
Background:
The cut-and-sew maze (CSM) procedure has an excellent efficacy for the elimination of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) concomitant with mitral valve surgery. Because of the complexity and prolongation of cardiopulmonary bypass, CSM has not been widely used. The aim of this study was to examine a modified maze procedure that preserves the "cut-and-sew" procedure in the left atrium and uses cryoablation in the right atrium along with cavotricuspid isthmus.
Methods:
From December 2013 to December 2018, 229 patients underwent CSM, and 43 underwent the modified maze procedure during mitral valve surgery. Propensity score matching analysis was used to perform selective 1:2 ratio matching of the 43 patients undergoing the modified maze procedure with 86 patients undergoing CSM. Early operative outcomes were analysed for differences. The absence of AF recurrence without the use of anti-arrhythmic drugs was calculated at 2 years by a generalised linear model analysis.
Results:
One (1.1%) early death occurred in the CSM group, and no deaths occurred in the modified maze group (p=0.722). The aortic cross-clamp durations were 76.30±8.86 minutes for the modified maze and 92.38±10.88 for the CSM procedure (p<0.001). There were no late strokes or deaths during the 2-year follow-up. The modified maze group showed similar rates of absence of AF without the use of anti-arrhythmic drugs as the CSM group within the 2 years (p=0.332).
Conclusion:
This modified maze simplifies the "cut-and-sew" procedure and reduces operating time while retaining the efficacy of CSM.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

