Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

194
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
194
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.5K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

794
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
794
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

997
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
997
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.8K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.8K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

83
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
83

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Latency and persistence of renewal in an intensive outpatient clinic.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same author

Toward a Predictive Model of Success in Contingency Management: A Proof of Concept Study Utilizing Behavioral Economic, Clinical Severity, and Alcohol Use Severity Measures.

The Psychological record·2026
Same author

Renewal of challenging behavior in an intensive outpatient clinic: Replication and extension to task changes.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same author

Biofeedback Impact on Limb Stiffness and Joint Power in Patients With ACL Reconstruction-A Secondary Analysis.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2025
Same author

Development of a Fall-Specific Impact Testing Method to Evaluate Safety Helmet Performance and Injury Risk.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Bilateral balance improves in low and high fall risk groups after unilateral total ankle arthroplasty.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2025
Same journal

Pulsatile Hemodynamics of Prehypertension and Hypertension: Associations with Pressure and Sex.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

A Pressure Difference-Based Strategy for Blood Oxygen Control in Membrane Oxygenators: Reduced Modeling, Computational Simulation, and Exploratory In Vivo Evaluation.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Multidirectional Optical Bone Densitometry Using a Simulation-Based Machine Learning Model: Experimental Validation with Bone Phantoms.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Numerical Study of Human Torso Mechanical Response and Injury Assessment Under Blast Loading with Bulletproof Protection.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Immediate and Mid-Long-Term Effects of Foot Orthoses on Gait Biomechanics and Clinical Characteristics in Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Screening and Evaluation of Post-stroke Dysphagia: Insights from Neurology, Artificial Intelligence and Data Science-A Scoping Review.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
06:35

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Published on: September 14, 2017

9.2K

Approximate Bayesian Techniques for Statistical Model Selection and Quantifying Model Uncertainty-Application to a

Christopher T Franck1, Sara L Arena2, Michael L Madigan2,3

  • 1Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, 403E Hutcheson Hall (0439), Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. chfranck@vt.edu.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|August 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers can now easily compare statistical models using posterior model probabilities. This method quantifies uncertainty in model selection and predictor importance, improving biomedical research.

Keywords:
Bayesian information criterionMulticollinearityStatistical model selection

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

9.6K
Paw-Print Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Recordings PrAnCER: A Low-Cost, Open-Access Automated Gait Analysis System for Assessing Motor Deficits
06:25

Paw-Print Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Recordings PrAnCER: A Low-Cost, Open-Access Automated Gait Analysis System for Assessing Motor Deficits

Published on: August 12, 2019

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
06:35

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Published on: September 14, 2017

9.2K
Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

9.6K
Paw-Print Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Recordings PrAnCER: A Low-Cost, Open-Access Automated Gait Analysis System for Assessing Motor Deficits
06:25

Paw-Print Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Recordings PrAnCER: A Low-Cost, Open-Access Automated Gait Analysis System for Assessing Motor Deficits

Published on: August 12, 2019

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Biomedical Research

Background:

  • Biomedical researchers frequently face the challenge of selecting the best statistical model from multiple candidates.
  • Existing methods like adjusted R-squared and p-values have limitations in quantifying model uncertainty.
  • Posterior model probabilities offer a robust approach to assess competing models and predictor significance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce an accessible method for calculating posterior model probabilities and posterior inclusion probabilities.
  • To demonstrate the utility of these probabilities in biomedical research using a published dataset.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes a simplified computation of posterior model probabilities and inclusion probabilities.
  • This accessible method utilizes the widely available Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).
  • The approach is illustrated by re-analyzing data from a gait study.

Main Results:

  • Posterior model probabilities provide a direct probabilistic comparison of candidate models.
  • Posterior inclusion probabilities quantify the likelihood of individual predictors being associated with the outcome.
  • The re-analysis of the gait study data highlights the practical application of these methods.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method simplifies the implementation of posterior model probabilities in biomedical research.
  • This approach enhances the quantification of uncertainty in statistical model selection.
  • Posterior model probabilities and inclusion probabilities offer valuable insights for interpreting statistical findings.