Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Battery in School-Age Children with HIV in Botswana

Billy M Tsima1, Elizabeth D Lowenthal2,3, Amelia E Van Pelt2,3,4

  • 1Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.

Insights

The adapted Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (PennCNB) shows adequate test-retest reliability for evaluating neurocognitive function in children with HIV in Botswana. Reliability varied across individual tests, particularly for memory, necessitating careful implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Pediatric Infectious Diseases
  • Global Health

Background:

  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection significantly impacts children and adolescents in Botswana.
  • Standardized neurocognitive testing is limited in this high-burden, low-resource setting.
  • The culturally adapted Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (PennCNB) aims to simplify neurocognitive assessment for youth.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the test-retest reliability of the culturally adapted PennCNB.
  • To determine the reliability of summary scores, domain scores, and individual tests within the PennCNB.
  • To identify potential practice effects influencing test-retest reliability.

Main Methods:

  • The study involved 65 school-age children (ages 7-17) living with HIV in Botswana.
  • Test-retest reliability was assessed using the culturally adapted PennCNB.
  • Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for summary, domain, and individual test scores.

Main Results:

  • PennCNB summary scores demonstrated high reliability (ICCs > 0.80).
  • Domain scores showed good to excellent reliability (ICCs = 0.66-0.88).
  • Individual tests exhibited more variable reliability (ICCs = 0.50-0.82), with memory tests being least reliable. Practice effects were noted in memory and complex cognition.

Conclusions:

  • The adapted PennCNB offers adequate test-retest reliability at the domain level for pediatric HIV populations in resource-limited settings.
  • Reliability varies significantly for individual PennCNB tests, requiring careful consideration during interpretation.
  • Findings highlight the need to account for test-specific reliability and practice effects when implementing the PennCNB in similar populations.