Distinct sensitivities to SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated humans and mice

Alexandra C Walls1, Laura A VanBlargan2, Kai Wu3

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Cell Reports
|August 21, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Vaccinated mice do not accurately reflect human antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants. Caution is advised when using mouse models to study vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 variants of concern.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Virology
  • Vaccinology

Background:

  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has prompted rapid vaccine development.
  • Understanding immune responses to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) is crucial for public health.
  • Neutralizing antibody titers are key indicators of protection and immune evasion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of the BALB/c mouse model in recapitulating human vaccine-elicited antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs.
  • To compare antibody responses in vaccinated mice with those observed in humans and non-human primates.

Main Methods:

  • Vaccination of BALB/c mice with various SARS-CoV-2 vaccine platforms.
  • Assessment of serum neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs.
  • Comparison of mouse antibody responses with existing data from human and non-human primate studies.

Main Results:

  • BALB/c mice did not faithfully replicate the breadth and potency of neutralizing antibody responses seen in humans or non-human primates.
  • The mouse model showed limitations in modeling the immune response to diverse SARS-CoV-2 VOCs.

Conclusions:

  • The BALB/c mouse model may not be a reliable correlate for human vaccine-elicited antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs.
  • Researchers should exercise caution when interpreting data from mouse models regarding vaccine effectiveness and immune evasion in the context of COVID-19.