Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Continuous Venous-Arterial Doppler Ultrasound During a Preload Challenge
Published on: January 20, 2023
Prospective Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Penile Helicine Circulation by Power Doppler During Dynamic Ultrasound in
Alessandro Zucchi1, Fabio Pezzoni2, Antonio L Pastore3
1Department of Translationals Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Objective:
To evaluate the usefulness of Power Doppler to improve the diagnostic work up of veno-occlusive erectile dysfunction patients.
Materials And Methods:
Patients affected by erectile dysfunction, mean IIEF 5 = 13.5 (12-17) for at least 6 months, were enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional study. All patients underwent Dynamic Power Doppler after intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs (PGE1 20 mcg and Papaverine 6 mg). Poor responders' patients subsequently underwent to cavernosometry to get a full assessment of the vascular framework.
Results:
202 patients (mean age 46 years), were included in the study. 96 subjects (47.5%) who did not adequately respond to the intracavernous injection -test, subsequently underwent to cavernosometry. In 42 of 96 patients (43.7%) cavernosometry was positive for veno-occlusive dysfunction. In a total of 160 patients who did not have veno-occlusive dysfunction (54 with negative cavernosometry + 106 intracavernous injection-test responders), the Power Doppler was normal in 126 (78.8%) and pathological in 34 (21.3%) in terms of steric conformation of "low flow" vessels corresponding to the Cavernosal Terminal Unit. The diagnostic sensitivity of Power Doppler towards veno-occlusive dysfunction was found to be 52.4% (Positive Predictive Value: 39.3%), the specificity was 78.8% (Negative Predictive Value: 86.3%) and the total diagnostic accuracy was equal to 73.3%.
Conclusion:
Collected data evidenced that patients who reported altered morphological features of the Cavernosal Terminal Unit had an approximately 4-fold greater risk of having veno-occlusive dysfunction compared to patients who had normal Power Doppler features (OR = 4.076; 95% CI: 1.996-8.327).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry

