Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025
Laboratory Administration of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation taVNS: Technique, Targeting, and Considerations
Published on: January 7, 2019
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Treatment
Christine Sigrist1, Bushra Torki1, Lars-Oliver Bolz2
1Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Background:
Noninvasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has promising therapeutic potential in a wide range of applications across somatic and psychiatric conditions. Compared with invasive vagus nerve stimulation, good safety and tolerability profiles also support the use of tVNS in pediatric patients. Potential neurodevelopment-specific needs, however, raise concerns regarding the age-appropriate adjustment of treatment protocols and applied stimulation parameters.
Objective:
In this study, we aimed to review registered trials and published studies to synthesize existing tVNS treatment protocols and stimulation parameters applied in pediatric patients.
Materials And Methods:
A systematic search of electronic data bases (PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO) and ClinicalTrials was conducted. Information on patient and study-level characteristics (eg, clinical condition, sample size), the tVNS device (eg, brand name, manufacturer), stimulation settings (eg, pulse width, stimulation intensity), and stimulation protocol (eg, duration, dosage of stimulation) was extracted.
Results:
We identified a total of 15 publications (four study protocols) and 15 registered trials applying tVNS in pediatric patients (<18 years of age). Most of these studies did not exclusively address pediatric patients. None of the studies elaborated on neurodevelopmental aspects or justified the applied protocol or stimulation parameters for use in pediatric patients.
Conclusions:
No dedicated pediatric tVNS devices exist. Neither stimulation parameters nor stimulation protocols for tVNS are properly justified in pediatric patients. Evidence on age-dependent stimulation effects of tVNS under a neurodevelopment framework is warranted. We discuss the potential implications of these findings with clinical relevance, address some of the challenges of tVNS research in pediatric populations, and point out key aspects in future device development and research in addition to clinical studies on pediatric populations.
