Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

856
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
856
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.9K
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

278
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
278
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

510
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
510

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring contrast sensitivity in school children and young adults: a comparison between Pelli-Robson and SpotChecks charts.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2026
Same author

Additional accommodative controls in near heterophoria targets do not improve accommodative responses in young adults.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same author

Crowding can impact both low and high contrast visual acuity measurements.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Number of flankers influences foveal crowding and contour interaction differently.

Vision research·2020
Same author

Technical Report: The Mechanism of Contour Interaction Differs in the Fovea and Periphery.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2020
Same author

Detection of anomalies in the red reflex test requires adequate training.

Clinical & experimental optometry·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

14.5K

Differences in stereoacuity between crossed and uncrossed disparities reduce with practice.

Robin Clayton1, John Siderov1

  • 1Centre for Vision across the Life Span, Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.

Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics : the Journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
|August 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Stereoacuity, a measure of 3D vision, improves with repeated testing. A single measurement is insufficient for accurate clinical evaluation of adult stereopsis.

Keywords:
RandotTNOcrossed disparitystereoacuitystereopsisuncrossed disparity

More Related Videos

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

289
Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

14.5K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

289
Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Vision Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Stereoacuity, a form of hyperacuity, is known to improve with practice.
  • Understanding the impact of repeated measurements on stereoacuity is crucial for accurate clinical assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of repeated clinical measurements on stereoacuity.
  • To evaluate stereoacuity using both crossed and uncrossed disparity stimuli with two common stereotests.

Main Methods:

  • Adults (n=17) with normal binocular vision underwent stereoacuity testing over six weeks.
  • Randot and TNO stereotests were used, measuring both crossed and uncrossed disparities.
  • Threshold stereoacuity was determined by the lowest disparity level for correct identification.

Main Results:

  • Stereoacuity significantly improved across the first five measurement visits (p=0.05).
  • No significant main effect of disparity direction was found (p=0.91).
  • A significant interaction between disparity direction and stereotest was observed (p=0.01).

Conclusions:

  • Repeated measurements significantly improved stereoacuity for both Randot and TNO tests.
  • Differences in crossed vs. uncrossed stereoacuity varied by test and diminished with repetition.
  • A single stereoacuity test is inadequate for a comprehensive clinical evaluation of adult stereopsis.