Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methods used by guideline developers to create out-of-hospital health guidelines: a cross-sectional survey.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

The Safety of Selective COX-2 Inhibitors in Tonsillectomy Patients: a Systematic Review.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2026
Same author

Assessing the trustworthiness of health guidelines recommendations: the transparent, rigorous, useable, standardized, and trustworthy guide (TRUSTGUIDES) tools development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

A call for methodological guidance to support initiatives to develop diagnostic criteria for conditions without reference standard diagnostic tests.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

In response to "Caveats for systematic reviews of prevalence studies".

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for scoping reviews: a scoping review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Timing and causes of neonatal deaths in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy compared with standard IVF/ICSI in women with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Innovations in communication between patients, caregivers, health care providers, and trainees in inpatient pediatrics: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Oral health interventions for UK-based Bengali children and their families: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Reliability of lung ultrasound in adult patients in emergency and intensive care settings: a systematic review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Integrated service strategies for women experiencing intimate partner violence and substance use problems: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K

Methods for developing quality indicators for evidence implementation: a scoping review protocol.

Alexa McArthur1, Zachary Munn, Lucylynn Lizarondo

  • 1JBI, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

JBI Evidence Synthesis
|August 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This scoping review examines evidence on developing quality indicators for healthcare programs. It aims to clarify inconsistent terminology and methods for better quality measurement in healthcare.

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Healthcare organizations use quality indicators (QIs) for evaluating care based on structure, process, or outcomes.
  • The development and application of QIs in healthcare are hindered by inconsistent terminology and definitions, causing confusion.
  • Lack of clarity in QI development impacts their pragmatic use and effectiveness in quality improvement initiatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a scoping review to identify and understand the extent and types of evidence regarding the development of quality indicators.
  • To explore key concepts, terms, definitions, and methodologies used in quality indicator development globally.
  • To address inconsistencies in quality indicator development for improved healthcare program evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive search strategy will identify published and unpublished literature, including studies, guidelines, and evidence syntheses.
  • A 3-step search strategy will be employed to ensure thoroughness.
  • Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, data extraction, and analysis following JBI's scoping review methodology.

Main Results:

  • Findings will map the existing evidence base on quality indicator development in healthcare.
  • The review will identify common frameworks and approaches used internationally for developing quality indicators.
  • Results will highlight areas of inconsistency and potential improvements in quality indicator development.

Conclusions:

  • Clarifying terminology and standardizing development methods are crucial for effective quality indicators.
  • This review will provide a comprehensive overview to guide future research and practice in healthcare quality indicator development.
  • The findings aim to enhance the consistency and pragmatic utility of quality indicators in healthcare programs.