Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Vision01:24

Vision

55.1K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
55.1K
Visual System01:26

Visual System

659
Light enters the eye through the cornea, a transparent, dome-shaped surface covering the surface of the eyeball that helps to direct and focus incoming light. This light is then channeled toward the pupil, an adjustable opening whose size is controlled by the iris. The iris, a pigmented muscle, regulates the amount of light entering the eye by contracting or dilating the pupil, thereby ensuring optimal light levels for clear vision.
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
659
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

215
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
215
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

4.8K
The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
4.8K
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex01:14

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

4.5K
The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex....
4.5K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

856
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
856

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual Simulation Is Supported by Sequential Monitoring in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Monkeys engage in visual simulation to solve complex problems.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Learning of the same task subserved by substantially different mechanisms between patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and healthy individuals.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

The Architecture of Object-Based Attention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

A role for visual areas in physics simulations.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2022
Same author

Multisensory Integration Uses a Real-Time Unisensory-Multisensory Transform.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

687

Evidence for Independent Processing of Shape by Vision and Touch.

Ryan L Miller1, David L Sheinberg2,3

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 ryan.miller@brown.edu.

Eneuro
|August 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Shape recognition differs between vision and touch. This study found that comparing visual and haptic shapes relies on different features, suggesting distinct neural representations for object recognition across senses.

Keywords:
cross-modalhapticmultisensoryobject recognitionsupramodalvisual

More Related Videos

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.4K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

687
Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.4K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Visual object recognition is well-understood, but haptic (touch-based) shape recognition and cross-modal comparisons remain less explored.
  • Similar brain structures for visual and haptic recognition are hypothesized to avoid redundant neural circuitry, with some evidence supporting this.
  • Understanding modality-specific shape representation is key to investigating potential shared neural pathways for object recognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how humans compare shapes presented visually versus haptically.
  • To determine if algorithmic shape comparison methods align with human behavior across different sensory modalities.
  • To identify whether shape comparison strategies differ between visual-only, haptic-only, and cross-modal (visual-haptic) tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Human participants performed a one-back, same-different shape comparison task.
  • Tasks included within-modality (visual-visual, haptic-haptic) and cross-modal (visual-haptic) comparisons.
  • Various shape metrics were used to predict behavioral performance based on stimulus shape, orientation, and modality.

Main Results:

  • The most effective shape metrics for predicting performance varied significantly depending on the sensory modality of the compared shapes.
  • This modality dependence suggests that different shape features are prioritized during comparison in visual versus haptic tasks.
  • Behavioral data indicates that shape comparison is not solely reliant on a single, modality-independent neural representation.

Conclusions:

  • Object recognition processes appear to be modality-specific, utilizing distinct features for shape comparison.
  • The findings challenge the notion of a single, unified, modality-agnostic region for shape representation in the brain.
  • This research highlights the importance of considering sensory modality when studying neural mechanisms of object recognition.