Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Real-world compliance with the 2020 U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer polypectomy surveillance
Jeffrey Dong1, Linda F Wang1, Eric Ardolino2
1Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Compliance with 2020 colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines is low, especially for low-risk adenomas. Adherence has improved but remains suboptimal two years post-publication, indicating a need for further research to enhance adoption.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Oncology
- Public Health
Background:
- Screening colonoscopies carry risks and costs; inadequate surveillance can lead to missed colorectal cancer.
- The 2020 U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF) updated polypectomy surveillance guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure compliance with the 2020 USMSTF polypectomy surveillance guidelines.
- To compare real-world compliance rates with survey data.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study comparing surveillance intervals for first-time average-risk colonoscopies against 2020 USMSTF guidelines.
- Analysis of clinical records from baseline (Nov 2019-Jan 2020) and post-guideline periods (Mar 2021-May 2022).
- Comparison of real-world compliance with survey data (Nov 2020-Feb 2021).
Main Results:
- Overall compliance was 48.9% across 532 colonoscopies.
- Compliance varied significantly: 8.3% for low-risk adenomas (LRAs), 88.3% for high-risk adenomas, 63.1% for sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), and 88.6% for hyperplastic polyps.
- Noncompliance was linked to endoscopists completing training over 10 years prior or performing >800 colonoscopies annually.
Conclusions:
- Two years post-publication, adoption of the 2020 USMSTF surveillance guidelines remains low.
- Compliance for LRAs improved from baseline but remained low (8.3%).
- Further research on patient outcomes for LRAs and SSPs may improve guideline adherence.
More Related Videos
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy