Factor structure, reliability and criterion-related validity of the English version of the Problematic Series
Emanuele Fino1, Mollie Humphries1, Jake Robertson1
1NTU Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, UK.
Background:
Psychological research in the past decade has investigated the psychosocial implications of problematic use of on-demand online video streaming services, particularly series watching. Yet, a psychometric measure of problematic series watching in English is not available.
Aims:
The present study aimed to test the factor structure, reliability and criterion-related validity of the English version of the Problematic Series Watching Scale, a six-item self-report assessing problematic series watching, based on the biopsychosocial components model of addiction.
Method:
Participants were recruited from two UK university student samples. Study 1 (n = 333) comprised confirmatory factor analysis, reliability tests and item response theory analyses to test the original unidimensional model and investigate each item's levels of discrimination and information. Study 2 (n = 209) comprised correlation analyses to test the criterion-related validity of the scale.
Results:
There was a good fit of the theoretical model of the scale to the data (Comparative Fit Index = 0.998, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.024 [90% CI 0.000-0.093], Standardised Root Mean square Residual = 0.048), satisfactory reliability (ω = 0.79) and item levels of discrimination and information. The scale positively correlated with time spent watching series (r = 0.26, P < 0.001) and negative affect (r = 0.43, P < 0.001), and correlated negatively with positive affect (r = -0.12, P > 0.05), mental well-being (r = -0.25, P < 0.001) and sleep quality (r = -0.14, P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Results are discussed in relation to the ongoing debate on binge watching and series watching in the context of positive reinforcement versus problematic behaviour.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Ratio Level of Measurement
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
In contrast, source traits are the...


