Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation
Published on: August 26, 2014
Efficacy of using red dichromatic imaging throughout endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure
Aoi Kita1, Shiko Kuribayashi1, Yuki Itoi1
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, 371-8514, Japan.
Full time Red Dichromatic Imaging endoscopic submucosal dissection (FTR-ESD) significantly enhances dissection speed compared to white light imaging (WLI-ESD). This novel technique is safe and offers comparable therapeutic outcomes, warranting further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Endoscopic Surgery
- Medical Imaging Technology
Background:
- Management of bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is critical for patient safety.
- Red Dichromatic Imaging (RDI) is an advanced endoscopic technology that improves visualization of deep vessels and bleeding sources compared to standard white light imaging (WLI).
- The hypothesis is that utilizing RDI throughout the entire cutting phase of ESD (FTR-ESD) may lead to improved resection rates, reduced procedure times, and fewer complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy and safety of full time RDI ESD (FTR-ESD) compared to WLI-ESD.
- To evaluate the impact of FTR-ESD on key procedural metrics such as resection rate, procedure time, and complication occurrence.
- To determine if FTR-ESD offers advantages in terms of dissection speed and overall therapeutic outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective observational study was conducted on 82 patients undergoing ESD for esophageal, gastric, or colorectal cancers.
- Procedures were performed by a single expert endoscopist between January 2018 and March 2021.
- Outcomes were analyzed comparing early cases using WLI-ESD (n=57) with later cases using FTR-ESD (n=25).
Main Results:
- The median procedure time was similar between FTR-ESD (35 min) and WLI-ESD (40 min), not reaching statistical significance (p=0.34).
- FTR-ESD demonstrated a significantly faster median dissection speed (27.23 mm²/min) compared to WLI-ESD (20.94 mm²/min) (p=0.025).
- Multivariate analysis identified tumor size (>30 mm) and FTR-ESD as independent factors for faster dissection speed. No significant differences were observed in R0 resection, en bloc resection, or adverse event rates.
Conclusions:
- FTR-ESD significantly enhances dissection speed compared to WLI-ESD.
- The FTR-ESD procedure can be performed safely, with therapeutic outcomes comparable to WLI-ESD.
- Further multicenter prospective studies are recommended to validate these findings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...

