Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

06:26
Author Spotlight: Exploring Breathing Techniques and Digital Solutions for Enhancing Running Performance
Published on: September 27, 2024
596
Algoritmically improved microwave radar monitors breathing more acurrate than sensorized belt
Andrzej Czyżewski1, Bozena Kostek2, Adam Kurowski1,3
1Department of Multimedia Systems, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80‑233, Gdańsk, Poland.
Scientific Reports
|August 24, 2022
Summary
This study introduces a new method to compare respiratory signals from wearable belts and contactless microwave radar sensors. Breathing patterns, not device type, cause signal variability, showing the method
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Signal Processing
- Respiratory Monitoring
Background:
- Respiratory signal acquisition typically uses wearable sensors.
- Contactless monitoring offers a non-invasive alternative.
- Comparing data from diverse sensors requires robust processing methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel method for measuring, processing, and comparing respiratory signals.
- To assess the compatibility and reliability of data from a wearable sensorized belt and a microwave radar-based sensor.
- To identify sources of variability in respiratory signal measurements.
Main Methods:
- Acquisition of respiratory signals using a wearable sensorized belt and a microwave radar-based sensor.
- Development of a data processing algorithm including octave error elimination and resampling to a common sample rate.
- Statistical analysis using Levene's test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post hoc test to compare signal outcomes.
Main Results:
- The proposed assessment method for respiratory signals demonstrates statistical stability.
- Variability in breathing rate measurements primarily stems from individual breathing patterns.
- The working principles of the wearable belt and microwave radar sensors do not significantly contribute to measurement variability.
Conclusions:
- The novel method effectively processes and compares respiratory signals from different sensor types.
- Individual breathing patterns are the main source of signal variability, not the sensor technology.
- Future work will focus on further refining the analysis and exploring broader applications.

