Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Measuring Ascending Aortic Stiffness In Vivo in Mice Using Ultrasound
Published on: December 2, 2014
Aortic root dilation in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: Does aortic root stiffness matter?
Kelly Cox1, Yousi A Oquendo2, David Liang3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.
Objective:
Aortic root (AoR) size remains an imperfect predictor of rate of aortic dilation in Marfan syndrome (MFS). Indicators of vascular phenotype such as aortic stiffness have been proposed as additional predictors. In this study we assessed the rate of AoR dilation and stiffness in adult patients with MFS.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective chart review. We included adult patients with MFS (aged 20-40 years) with at least 2 local echocardiograms 6 months apart (no aortic surgery in-between). A blinded observer analyzed the echocardiograms. AoR dilation rate and stiffness were calculated.
Results:
Thirty-two patients (53% women; median age, 21.1; interquartile range [IQR], 19-24 years at first echocardiogram) were included. AoR dilation rate in the entire cohort was 0 to 8 mm/year (median, 0.465; IQR, 0.23-1.45 mm/year). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that baseline AoR stiffness was associated with AoR dilation rate (β = 0.0004; P < .001 for elastic modulus), whereas baseline age and baseline AoR dimension were not. Eighteen of these 32 patients (56%) eventually had AoR surgery (Sx) and 14 did not have surgery (NSx). At baseline, Sx and NSx patients were similar in age. AoR dimension was larger (Sx, 4.27 cm; IQR, 4.05-4.49 cm vs NSx, 3.73 cm; IQR, 3.37-4.09 cm; P = .011) and AoR stiffness was higher in Sx patients (beta stiffness index: median, 23.2; IQR, 17.8-28.6 vs median, 15.6; IQR, 11.6-19.7; P = .024). AoR dilation rate was greater in Sx patients, independent of baseline AoR dimension (1.63 ± 0.41 mm/year vs 0.38 ± 0.08 mm/year; P = .01).
Conclusions:
Our results showed that AoR dilation rate varies among adult patients with MFS and is associated with baseline AoR stiffness, measured by echocardiography. Further studies are warranted to determine how aortic stiffness can be implemented clinically to refine management in patients with MFS.
Insights
Aortic stiffness predicts aortic dilation rate in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients, unlike aortic root size. This finding may improve clinical management strategies for MFS vascular complications.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- Aortic root (AoR) size is an imperfect predictor of aortic dilation in Marfan syndrome (MFS).
- Aortic stiffness is a potential indicator of vascular phenotype and predictor of aortic dilation.
- Assessing AoR dilation rate and stiffness in adult MFS patients is crucial for understanding disease progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the rate of AoR dilation and stiffness in adult patients with MFS.
- To determine if AoR stiffness is a better predictor of AoR dilation rate than AoR size in MFS.
- To identify factors associated with AoR dilation and the need for aortic surgery in MFS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of adult MFS patients (aged 20-40 years) with at least two echocardiograms 6 months apart.
- Calculation of AoR dilation rate and stiffness using echocardiographic data analyzed by a blinded observer.
- Comparison of baseline characteristics, AoR dimensions, stiffness, and dilation rates between patients who underwent aortic surgery (Sx) and those who did not (NSx).
Main Results:
- Baseline AoR stiffness, but not baseline age or AoR dimension, was significantly associated with AoR dilation rate (P < .001).
- Patients who eventually required AoR surgery had significantly larger baseline AoR dimensions (P = .011) and higher AoR stiffness (P = .024) compared to those who did not.
- AoR dilation rate was significantly greater in patients who underwent surgery, independent of baseline AoR dimension (P = .01).
Conclusions:
- AoR dilation rate in adult MFS patients varies and is associated with baseline AoR stiffness measured by echocardiography.
- Aortic stiffness may serve as a more accurate predictor of aortic dilation progression in MFS than AoR size alone.
- Further research is needed to integrate aortic stiffness measurements into clinical practice for refined MFS management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

