Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Angiographic outcome in patients treated with deferred stenting after ST-segment elevation myocardial
Lars Nepper-Christensen1, Henning Kelbæk2, Kiril A Ahtarovski1
1Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 København Ø, Denmark.
Insights
Deferred stent implantation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) reduces slow flow and distal embolization. This approach is particularly beneficial for older patients and those with high thrombus burden.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Stent implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can lead to flow disturbances and distal embolization.
- These complications may negatively impact clinical outcomes.
- Deferred stent implantation has shown potential to reduce myocardial function impairment, but the underlying mechanisms require clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of deferred stenting in reducing flow disturbances in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI.
- To assess the impact of deferred stenting on incidences of slow/no reflow and distal embolization.
Main Methods:
- A substudy of the DANAMI-3-DEFER trial randomized 1205 STEMI patients to deferred versus immediate stent implantation.
- Primary and secondary outcomes included incidences of slow/no reflow and distal embolization.
- Subgroup analyses were performed to identify high-risk populations benefiting most from deferred stenting.
Main Results:
- Deferred stenting significantly reduced distal embolization (OR 0.67, P=0.040) and slow/no reflow (OR 0.60, P=0.039).
- The protective effect was most pronounced in patients over 65, those with occluded culprit arteries, and those with high thrombus burden (thrombus grade >3).
- Significant interactions were observed in these high-risk subgroups.
Conclusions:
- Deferred stent implantation is effective in reducing slow/no reflow and distal embolization following primary PCI for STEMI.
- This strategy offers particular benefits for elderly patients and those with significant coronary occlusion or high thrombus burden.
- The findings support deferred stenting as a method to mitigate adverse events associated with primary PCI in STEMI.
Aims:
Stent implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) occasionally results in flow disturbances and distal embolization, which may cause adverse clinical outcomes. Deferred stent implantation seems to reduce the impairment on myocardial function, although the mechanisms have not been clarified. We sought to evaluate whether deferred stenting could reduce flow disturbance in patients treated with primary PCI.
Methods And Results:
Patients with STEMI included in the DANAMI-3-DEFER trial were randomized to deferred versus immediate stent implantation. The primary and secondary outcomes of this substudy were the incidences of slow/no reflow and distal embolization. A total of 1205 patients were included. Deferred stenting (n = 594) resulted in lower incidences of distal embolization [odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.98, P = 0.040] and slow/no reflow (OR 0.60, 95%CI 0.37-0.97, P = 0.039). In high-risk subgroups, the protective effect was greatest in patients >65 years of age (slow/no reflow: OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.72, P = 0.004 and distal embolization: OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.63, P = 0.001), in patients presenting with occluded culprit artery at admission (slow/no reflow: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.65, P = 0.001 and distal embolization: OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.96, P = 0.036) and in patients with thrombus grade >3 (slow/no reflow: OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.67, P = 0.001 and distal embolization: OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.64, P < 0.001) with a significant P for interaction for all.
Conclusion:
Deferred stent implantation reduces the incidences of slow/no reflow and distal embolization, especially in older patients and in those with total coronary occlusion or high level of thrombus burden.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

