Cognitive and Academic Outcomes of Fundamental Motor Skill and Physical Activity Interventions Designed for Children

Pinja Jylänki1, Theo Mbay1, Anni Byman1

  • 1Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00170 Helsinki, Finland.

Brain Sciences
|August 26, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Fundamental motor skills and physical activity interventions show varied effects on cognitive and academic skills in young children with special needs. More high-quality research is needed due to study limitations.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Special Education
  • Pediatric Physical Therapy

Background:

  • Children with special educational needs often face challenges in cognitive and academic development.
  • Fundamental motor skills (FMS) and physical activity (PA) are crucial for overall child development.
  • Interventions targeting FMS and PA may offer a pathway to improve skills in this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the methodological quality of studies on FMS and PA interventions.
  • To evaluate the effects of these interventions on cognitive and academic skills in 3- to 7-year-old children with special educational needs.
  • To identify factors influencing intervention effectiveness based on the type and severity of special needs.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search across seven databases (e.g., ERIC, PubMed, Scopus) updated January 2022.
  • Inclusion of 22 studies involving 1883 children with various special educational needs.
  • Methodological quality assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool; Cohen's d effect sizes calculated.

Main Results:

  • A majority of the included studies (19/22) had weak methodological quality.
  • Intervention effects varied by learning difficulty severity: largest cognitive/language gains in children at-risk due to family background, largest executive function gains in children with learning disabilities.
  • Significant heterogeneity across studies complicates generalizable conclusions.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence on FMS and PA interventions for children with special needs is limited by low methodological quality and study heterogeneity.
  • While some positive effects are suggested, particularly for specific skill domains and child subgroups, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn.
  • High-quality research is essential to establish the efficacy and optimal implementation of these interventions for diverse special educational needs populations.

Related Concept Videos