Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population
Michaela Kozakova1,2, Carmela Morizzo3, Giuli Jamagidze4
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Insights
Vascular age (VA) measured by carotid artery distensibility showed good agreement with risk-based VA. Using VA in risk models reclassified many individuals, suggesting its potential to improve cardiovascular risk prediction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
- Gerontology
Background:
- Vascular age (VA) aims to simplify cardiovascular (CV) risk communication and enhance prediction models.
- Current risk scores like Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE) have limitations in predicting individual CV risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare risk-based VA (from FRS and SCORE) with value-based VA derived from common carotid artery (CCA) distensibility coefficient (DC).
- To assess the impact of DC-based VA on cardiovascular risk reclassification.
Main Methods:
- Measured CCA distensibility coefficient (DC) using radiofrequency-based arterial wall tracking in 528 middle-aged individuals without CV disease.
- Calculated DC-based VA as the median value for sex in a reference population.
- Computed FRS-based and SCORE-based VA.
- Assessed agreement between DC-based VA and risk-based VA, and evaluated risk reclassification upon substituting chronological age with DC-based VA.
Main Results:
- Good agreement was observed between DC-based VA and FRS-based VA (mean difference 0.46 ± 12.2 years).
- Higher mean difference between DC-based and SCORE-based VA (3.07 ± 12.7 years).
- Substituting chronological age with DC-based VA reclassified 28% (FRS) and 49% (SCORE) of individuals to a higher risk category.
Conclusions:
- The SCORE model, lacking consideration for diabetes and antihypertensive treatment, is best suited as a screening tool for healthy individuals.
- DC-based VA measurement could enhance CV risk prediction models, including FRS, by integrating additional vascular aging factors.
- Prospective studies are necessary to validate the role of DC-based VA in clinical risk prediction.
Abstract:
The concept of vascular age (VA) was proposed to provide patients with an understandable explanation of cardiovascular (CV) risk and to improve the performance of prediction models. The present study compared risk-based VA derived from Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE) models with value-based VA derived from the measurement of the common carotid artery (CCA) distensibility coefficient (DC), and it assessed the impact of DC-based VA on risk reclassification. In 528 middle-aged individuals apparently free of CV disease, DC was measured by radiofrequency-based arterial wall tracking that was previously utilised to establish sex- and age-specific reference values in a healthy population. DC-based VA represented the median value (50th percentile) for given sex in the reference population. FRS-based and SCORE-based VA was calculated as recommended. We observed a good agreement between DC-based and FRS-based VA, with a mean difference of 0.46 ± 12.2 years (p = 0.29), while the mean difference between DC-based and SCORE-based VA was higher (3.07 ± 12.7 years, p < 0.0001). When only nondiabetic individuals free of antihypertensive therapy were considered (n = 341), the mean difference dropped to 0.70 ± 12.8 years (p = 0.24). Substitution of chronological age with DC-based VA in FRS and SCORE models led to a reclassification of 28% and 49% of individuals, respectively, to the higher risk category. Our data suggest that the SCORE prediction model, in which diabetes and antihypertensive treatment are not considered, should be used as a screening tool only in healthy individuals. The use of VA derived from CCA distensibility measurements could improve the performance of risk prediction models, even that of the FRS model, as it might integrate risk prediction with additional risk factors participating in vascular ageing, unique to each individual. Prospective studies are needed to validate the role of DC-based VA in risk prediction.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Vascular Resistance
The primary determinants of vascular resistance are vessel diameter, blood viscosity, and vessel length. Among these, vessel diameter plays the most significant role due to the fourth power relationship described by...
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests

