Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

140
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
140
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

3.9K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
3.9K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

1.8K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
1.8K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

2.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
2.1K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.6K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

276
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
276

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imaging foundation model for universal enhancement of non-ideal measurement CT.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Quantum Machine Learning for Biomedical Classification Problems: A Feasibility Study on Real Quantum Hardware.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Elevated microbially-derived metabolites in autism: a possible diagnostic screening test for a distinct ASD phenotype.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Alzheimer's Disease and circadian disruption sex-specifically contribute to a loss of bone maintenance in APP/PS1 model mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A Computational Pipeline for Activity Prediction Using Wearable Sensor Data.

Research square·2026
Same author

The current and future landscape of AI foundation models for cancer management.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Correction: Rao et al. Ensemble Deep-Learning-Based Prognostic and Prediction for Recurrence of Sporadic Odontogenic Keratocysts on Hematoxylin and Eosin Stained Pathological Images of Incisional Biopsies. <i>J. Pers. Med.</i> 2022, <i>12</i>, 1220.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same journal

Three-Dimensional Bronchovascular Modelling in Sublobar Pulmonary Resection: A Tool for Personalised Thoracic Surgery.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same journal

Serum Albumin, Globulin and Albumin-Globulin Ratios as Biomarkers of Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same journal

New Advances and Perspectives in Ophthalmology: Progress and Modern Challenges Toward Personalized Eye Care.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same journal

Bridging Ancestry-Stratified Bias in Pharmacogenomics AI: Toward Metabolomics-Inclusive Multi-Omics Precision Medicine.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same journal

Hormone-Driven Growth Signaling as a Therapeutic Target in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Implications for Drug-Resistant Disease.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 30, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Framework for Testing Robustness of Machine Learning-Based Classifiers.

Joshua Chuah1,2, Uwe Kruger1, Ge Wang1,2

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA.

Journal of Personalized Medicine
|August 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework to assess the robustness of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) diagnostic classifiers. The method predicts classifier reliability and tolerance to noise, aiding in biomarker discovery.

Keywords:
algorithmsartificial intelligencebiomarkerclassificationmachine learningomics analysis

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 30, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Informatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Background:

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly used for diagnostic biomarker classifiers.
  • Assessing the robustness and uncertainty of these AI/ML models is crucial but underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a framework for evaluating the robustness of existing AI/ML-based diagnostic classifiers.
  • To assess classifier performance variability, parameter changes, and feature importance under data perturbations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized factor analysis and Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate classifier robustness.
  • Assessed input feature importance and output/parameter variability in response to data perturbations.
  • Applied the framework to six common AI/ML techniques on a metabolomics dataset.

Main Results:

  • The framework successfully predicted the relative robustness of different classifiers without recomputation.
  • Quantified classifier performance variability and identified key input features.
  • Demonstrated the ability to estimate a priori a classifier's tolerance to noise while maintaining accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework provides a reliable method for assessing the robustness of AI/ML diagnostic classifiers.
  • This approach aids in understanding biomarker reliability and selecting robust models for clinical applications.
  • The findings highlight the importance of robustness evaluation in AI/ML biomarker development.