Predicting stroke in heart failure and reduced ejection fraction without atrial fibrillation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Toru Kondo1,2, Azmil H Abdul-Rahim3, Atefeh Talebi1
1British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.
Insights
Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) face high stroke risk. A validated risk score identifies HFrEF patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) who have a stroke risk similar to those with AF, suggesting potential benefits of targeted anticoagulation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have a significantly elevated risk of stroke.
- Anticoagulant therapy can mitigate stroke risk in HFrEF patients, but its overall risk-benefit profile is unfavorable in those without atrial fibrillation (AF).
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate a simple risk model for identifying HFrEF patients without AF who are at the highest risk of stroke.
- To determine if a subset of HFrEF patients without AF exhibits a stroke risk comparable to AF patients not receiving anticoagulation.
Main Methods:
- A pooled patient-level analysis of the PARADIGM-HF, ATMOSPHERE, and DAPA-HF trials was conducted.
- A previously derived risk model using prior stroke, insulin-treated diabetes, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels was validated in 20,159 patients, including 12,751 without baseline AF.
- Stroke events were analyzed in relation to the validated risk score.
Main Results:
- Among HFrEF patients without AF, 346 (2.7%) experienced a stroke over a median of 2.0 years (11.7 per 1000 patient-years).
- Stroke risk significantly increased with higher risk scores, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 3.73 compared to the lowest.
- Patients in the top risk quintile had a stroke rate of 21.2 per 1000 patient-years, similar to AF patients not on anticoagulation (20.1 per 1000 patient-years).
- The risk model demonstrated good discrimination (C-index 0.84).
Conclusions:
- A significant subset of HFrEF patients without AF can be identified as having a stroke risk equivalent to that of AF patients not receiving anticoagulation.
- For these high-risk individuals, the risk-benefit assessment may favor prophylactic anticoagulation, warranting prospective investigation.
Aims:
Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are at significant risk of stroke. Anticoagulation reduces this risk in patients with and without atrial fibrillation (AF), but the risk-to-benefit balance in the latter group, overall, is not favourable. Identification of patients with HFrEF, without AF, at the highest risk of stroke may allow targeted and safer use of prophylactic anticoagulant therapy.
Methods And Results:
In a pooled patient-level cohort of the PARADIGM-HF, ATMOSPHERE, and DAPA-HF trials, a previously derived simple risk model for stroke, consisting of three variables (history of prior stroke, insulin-treated diabetes, and plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level), was validated. Of the 20 159 patients included, 12 751 patients did not have AF at baseline. Among patients without AF, 346 (2.7%) experienced a stroke over a median follow up of 2.0 years (rate 11.7 per 1000 patient-years). The risk for stroke increased with increasing risk score: fourth quintile hazard ratio (HR) 2.35 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60-3.45]; fifth quintile HR 3.73 (95% CI 2.58-5.38), with the first quintile as reference. For patients in the top quintile, the rate of stroke was 21.2 per 1000 patient-years, similar to participants with AF not receiving anticoagulation (20.1 per 1000 patient-years). Model discrimination was good with a C-index of 0.84 (0.75-0.91).
Conclusion:
It is possible to identify a subset of HFrEF patients without AF with a stroke-risk equivalent to that of patients with AF who are not anticoagulated. In these patients, the risk-to-benefit balance might justify the use of prophylactic anticoagulation, but this hypothesis needs to be tested prospectively.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies