Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes01:23

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes

710
In the absence of an external magnetic field, nuclear spin states are degenerate and randomly oriented. When a magnetic field is applied, the spins begin to precess and orient themselves along (lower energy) or against (higher energy) the direction of the field. At equilibrium, a slight excess population of spins exists in the lower energy state. Because the direction of the magnetic field is fixed as the z-axis,  the precessing magnetic moments are randomly oriented around the z-axis.
710
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

1.1K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of...
1.1K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

1.6K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

999
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
999

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Photonic networking of quantum memories in high dimensions.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Quantum suppression of cold reactions far from the s-wave energy limit.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Floquet control of interactions and edge states in a programmable quantum simulator.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Non-equilibrium critical scaling and universality in a quantum simulator.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Optical Protection of Alkali-Metal Atoms from Spin Relaxation.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Quantum computing universal thermalization dynamics in a (2 + 1)D Lattice Gauge Theory.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Experimental Methods for Trapping Ions Using Microfabricated Surface Ion Traps
11:45

Experimental Methods for Trapping Ions Using Microfabricated Surface Ion Traps

Published on: August 17, 2017

14.6K

N-Body Interactions between Trapped Ion Qubits via Spin-Dependent Squeezing.

Or Katz1,2,3, Marko Cetina1,3, Christopher Monroe1,2,3,4

  • 1Duke Quantum Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27701, USA.

Physical Review Letters
|August 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Scientists developed a new method for N-body entangling interactions in trapped atomic ion qubits. This technique enables single-step generation of N-body gates, like the N-Toffoli gate, crucial for quantum computing.

More Related Videos

Cooling an Optically Trapped Ultracold Fermi Gas by Periodical Driving
11:21

Cooling an Optically Trapped Ultracold Fermi Gas by Periodical Driving

Published on: March 30, 2017

7.6K
Optical Trapping of Nanoparticles
13:39

Optical Trapping of Nanoparticles

Published on: January 15, 2013

22.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Experimental Methods for Trapping Ions Using Microfabricated Surface Ion Traps
11:45

Experimental Methods for Trapping Ions Using Microfabricated Surface Ion Traps

Published on: August 17, 2017

14.6K
Cooling an Optically Trapped Ultracold Fermi Gas by Periodical Driving
11:21

Cooling an Optically Trapped Ultracold Fermi Gas by Periodical Driving

Published on: March 30, 2017

7.6K
Optical Trapping of Nanoparticles
13:39

Optical Trapping of Nanoparticles

Published on: January 15, 2013

22.5K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Science
  • Atomic Physics
  • Quantum Computing

Background:

  • Trapped atomic ion qubits are a leading platform for quantum computation.
  • Entangling interactions are fundamental for quantum algorithms.
  • Existing methods often involve multi-step processes or are sensitive to motional states.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a simple, single-step protocol for generating N-body entangling interactions.
  • To demonstrate the creation of full N-body interactions in trapped ion systems.
  • To enable efficient implementation of complex multi-qubit gates.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing qubit state-dependent squeezing operations.
  • Applying displacement forces to the collective atomic motion.
  • Leveraging principles similar to the Mølmer-Sørensen interaction.

Main Results:

  • Successfully generated full N-body entangling interactions in a single step.
  • The proposed operation exhibits robustness against the state of atomic motion.
  • Demonstrated the capability to implement N-bit gates, including the N-Toffoli gate.

Conclusions:

  • The developed protocol offers a significant advancement for trapped ion quantum computing.
  • Single-step N-body gates enhance the efficiency and feasibility of quantum algorithms.
  • This method paves the way for more complex quantum simulations and computations.