Assessing the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on mortality: a population-based, matched case-control study

Adi Turjeman1, Eytan Wirtheim2, Itamar Poran3

  • 1Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Insights

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) significantly increased mortality risk threefold, irrespective of pre-existing conditions. This highlights COVID-19

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Estimating the independent impact of COVID-19 on mortality is complex.
  • Pre-existing conditions and demographics often confound mortality risk assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if COVID-19 independently elevates mortality risk.
  • To assess COVID-19's impact irrespective of age, sex, and underlying health conditions.

Main Methods:

  • A population-based, matched case-control study was conducted.
  • Adults insured by Clalit Health Services were analyzed.
  • Cases (deceased) were matched 1:1 with living controls based on age, sex, and comorbidities.

Main Results:

  • COVID-19 prevalence was higher in deceased individuals (13.5%) compared to controls (4%).
  • COVID-19 independently increased mortality risk (OR, 2.01), even without underlying diseases.
  • Independent risk factors included low socioeconomic status, dementia, and advanced age combined with COVID-19.

Conclusions:

  • COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a threefold increase in mortality risk, independent of underlying conditions.
  • These findings underscore COVID-19's significant mortality impact during the early pandemic, prior to widespread vaccination and therapeutics.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
556
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
243
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
432
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
307
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
714
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
264