Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Support after COVID-19 study: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study to develop recommendations for practice
Cathy Bulley1, Vaibhav Tyagi2, Eleanor Curnow3
1School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Musselburgh, UK CBulley@qmu.ac.uk.
None:
Objectives of study stage 1 were to: explore people's experiences of illness due to COVID-19 while feeling socially isolated or socially isolating; identify perceptions of what would support recovery; and synthesise insights into recommendations for supporting people after COVID-19. Study stage 2 objectives were to engage stakeholders in evaluating these recommendations and analyse likely influences on access to the support identified.
Design:
A two-stage, multimethod cross-sectional study was conducted from a postpositivist perspective. Stage 1 included an international online survey of people's experiences of illness, particularly COVID-19, in isolation (n=675 full responses). Stage 2 involved a further online survey (n=43), two tweetchats treated as large online focus groups (n=60 and n=27 people tweeting), two smaller focus groups (both n=4) and one interview (both using MS teams).
Setting:
Stage 1 had an international emphasis, although 87% of respondents were living in the UK. Stage 2 focused on the UK.
Participants:
Anyone aged 18+ and able to complete a survey in English could participate. Stage 2 included health professionals, advocates and people with lived experience.
Main Outcome Measures:
Descriptive data and response categories derived from open responses to the survey and the qualitative data.
Results:
Of those responding fully to stage 1 (mean age 44 years); 130 (19%) had experienced COVID-19 in isolation; 45 had recovered, taking a mean of 5.3 (range 1-54) weeks. 85 did not feel they had recovered; fatigue and varied 'other' symptoms were most prevalent and also had most substantial negative impacts. Our draft recommendations were highly supported by respondents to stage 2 and refined to produce final recommendations.
Conclusions:
Recommendations support access to progressive intensity and specialism of support, addressing access barriers that might inadvertently increase health inequalities. Multidisciplinary collaboration and learning are crucial, including the person with COVID-19 and/or Long Covid in the planning and decision making throughout.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques V
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

