Association of Time to Clinical Remission With Sustained Resolution in Children With New-Onset Infantile Spasms

Christopher J Yuskaitis1, John R Mytinger2, Fiona M Baumer2

  • 1From the Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology (C.J.Y., C.H.), Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Pediatrics (J.R.M.), Division of Pediatric Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus; Division of Child Neurology (F.M.B.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology and ICCTR Biostatistics and Research Design Center (B.Z., S.L.), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, MA; Division of Child Neurology (D.S.), Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, AR; Department of Pediatrics (S.A.H.), Division of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (E.G.Y.), Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Jane and John Justin Neurosciences (C.G.K.), Cook Children's Hospital, Fort Worth, TX; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (C.J.), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora; Department of Pediatrics (R.K.S.), Division of Neurology, Atrium Health/Levine Children's, Charlotte, NC; Division of Pediatric Neurology (S. Bhatia), Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Department of Pediatrics (S. Bhalla), Division of Child Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, GA; and Department of Pediatrics (R.S.), Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. christopher.yuskaitis@childrens.harvard.edu.

Neurology
|August 29, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Early identification of infantile spasms treatment response is crucial. Most infants respond within a week, and non-responders may need immediate reassessment for sequential therapy to optimize outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Neurology
  • Epileptology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Standard infantile spasms treatments like ACTH, oral steroids, or vigabatrin are ineffective for nearly half of affected children.
  • Early identification of non-responders is critical for timely initiation of sequential therapies.
  • Infantile spasms require prompt and effective treatment to improve long-term outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the time to clinical remission in infants with infantile spasms following standard treatment initiation.
  • To identify predictors of treatment response time in infantile spasms.
  • To inform clinical practice regarding the timing of reassessment for non-responding infants.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cohort study of 395 children aged 2-24 months with new-onset infantile spasms.
  • Inclusion of children treated with standard therapies: ACTH, oral steroids, or vigabatrin.
  • Definition of sustained treatment response based on spasm cessation, EEG normalization, and persistent remission.

Main Results:

  • Clinical remission occurred within 2 weeks in 43% of infants, with 81% of those responding within the first week.
  • No significant difference in median time to response was observed among ACTH, oral steroids, or vigabatrin.
  • Absence of hypsarrhythmia on pretreatment EEG predicted a higher likelihood of early treatment response (HR 2.23).

Conclusions:

  • Clinical remission for infantile spasms can often be identified by day 7 of treatment.
  • Infants not responding to initial standard therapy within one week warrant immediate reassessment.
  • Facilitating early sequential therapy for non-responders can optimize treatment outcomes in infantile spasms.
Abstract