Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
Published on: April 20, 2016
Development of Intrinsic Seismic Vulnerability Index (ISVI) for assessing roadway system and its assets framework
Ahmad Mohamad El-Maissi1, Sotirios A Argyroudis2, Moustafa Moufid Kassem3
1School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 14300, Malaysia.
This study introduces an integrated method to assess seismic vulnerability in road networks, correlating physical asset damage with accessibility impacts. The findings highlight key factors influencing vulnerability and accessibility, aiding risk mitigation for critical infrastructure.
Area of Science:
- Civil Engineering
- Earthquake Engineering
- Transportation Engineering
Background:
- Roadway systems are critical infrastructure, necessitating resilience against natural hazards like earthquakes.
- Existing seismic vulnerability models often overlook the interplay between physical asset damage, network functionality, and traffic disruption.
- A comprehensive approach is needed to integrate diverse factors for effective disaster risk management in transportation networks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an integrated methodology for evaluating the seismic vulnerability of road networks.
- To correlate physical asset damage (Intrinsic Seismic Vulnerability Index - ISVI) with changes in accessibility to critical services.
- To provide a decision-making tool for risk mitigation and enhanced emergency access.
Main Methods:
- Quantification of physical asset performance using the Intrinsic Seismic Vulnerability Index (ISVI) via Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis (NLDA).
- Assessment of road network accessibility rates using an Accessibility Index (AI) considering geographical factors.
- Integration of physical vulnerability and accessibility data to create transport performance maps.
Main Results:
- Embankment height and number of lanes were identified as the most influential parameters in physical vulnerability assessment.
- Soil type and pavement strength showed lesser impact, with soil type being more effective than pavement strength.
- The integrated approach demonstrated compatibility between physical vulnerability and accessibility, confirming reduced accessibility with increased vulnerability.
Conclusions:
- The proposed integrated methodology offers a more precise tool for seismic vulnerability assessment of road networks.
- The framework effectively correlates physical damage with reduced network accessibility, crucial for emergency planning.
- This approach supports infrastructure owners in mitigating risks and improving emergency response capabilities.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Microcracking in Concrete
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Indeterminate Structure
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

