Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Forced Oscillations01:06

Forced Oscillations

6.7K
When an oscillator is forced with a periodic driving force, the motion may seem chaotic. The motions of such oscillators are known as transients. After the transients die out, the oscillator reaches a steady state, where the motion is periodic, and the displacement is determined.
6.7K
Oscillations about an Equilibrium Position01:04

Oscillations about an Equilibrium Position

5.6K
Stability is an important concept in oscillation. If an equilibrium point is stable, a slight disturbance of an object that is initially at the stable equilibrium point will cause the object to oscillate around that point. For an unstable equilibrium point, if the object is disturbed slightly, it will not return to the equilibrium point. There are three conditions for equilibrium points—stable, unstable, and half-stable. A half-stable equilibrium point is also unstable, but is named so...
5.6K
Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

2.5K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wouldn't It Be Nice to Not Fall for It Twice? Prior Experience Does Not Abolish the Impact of Expectancy Violations on Attention Capture.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Novel evidence for cue-based retrieval of top-down sets in spatial cueing.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Rhythmic alternate prioritization in auditory feature-based attention.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

What captures women's visual attention and what they remember in romantic encounters: eye-tracking metrics and self-reports.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

The influence of perceptual and cognitive load on contingent-capture effects.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Rhythmic Fluctuations in Tactile Attention.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K

Motor-induced oscillations in choice response performance.

Ulrich Pomper1, Ulrich Ansorge1,2,3

  • 1Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Psychophysiology
|August 30, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Behavioral performance shows rapid 12.5-25 Hz fluctuations, even with salient stimuli. These oscillations may stem from sensorimotor rhythms, not just attention or perception.

Keywords:
alpha rhythmattentioncyclicmupsychophysicsvisual

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
07:28

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

Published on: August 2, 2016

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Motor Control
  • Perceptual Psychology

Background:

  • Previous research identified 4-12 Hz behavioral performance fluctuations, often linked to perception or attention with near-threshold stimuli.
  • Neural oscillations (8-20 Hz) in motor areas suggest potential motor control influences on performance.
  • The possibility of alternating effector prioritization (e.g., left vs. right hand) was unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of motor processes in behavioral performance fluctuations.
  • To examine if performance oscillations occur with highly salient stimuli.
  • To test for alternating prioritization of different effectors.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a dense-sampling behavioral approach with 26 participants.
  • Participants performed a simple visual discrimination task using salient stimuli.
  • Response-to-target intervals varied from 330 to 1040 ms; performance analyzed against this interval.

Main Results:

  • Significant fluctuations in reaction times (RTs) and sensitivity were observed between 12.5 and 25 Hz.
  • No evidence supported alternating prioritization of left- versus right-hand responses.
  • Behavioral oscillations were demonstrated even with highly salient stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • Behavioral performance oscillations are not limited to near-threshold stimuli and occur in more ecologically relevant situations.
  • Observed high-frequency fluctuations (12.5-25 Hz) suggest involvement of sensorimotor rhythms, potentially due to task simplicity.
  • While motor signals may contribute, perceptual processes might also influence these performance oscillations.