Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Toward Precision Phenotyping of Multiple Sclerosis
David Pitt1, Chih Hung Lo2, Susan A Gauthier2
1From the Yale University (David Pitt, C.H.L., E.L., M.M., M.R.L.), New Haven; Nanyang Technological University (C.H.L.), Singapore; Weill Cornell Medicine (S.A.G.), New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (R.A.H.), New York; University of Turku (L.M.A.), Finland; University of Michigan Medical School (Y.M.-D.), Ann Arbor; Columbia University Medical Center (C.R., P.L.D.J., S.W.), New York; The Boster Center for Multiple Sclerosis (A.B.), Columbus, OH; Cerneris Inc (I.T.), Wilmington, DE; Vanderbilt University Medical Center (F.B.), Nashville, TN; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (O.S.), Dallas; NYU Langone Medical Center (I.K.), New York; University of Southern California (Daniel Pelletier), Los Angeles; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School (P.S.), Greece; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (R.D.), Case Western Reserve University, OH; and University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital (M.L.), ON, Canada. david.pitt@yale.edu.
Abstract:
The classification of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been established by Lublin in 1996 and revised in 2013. The revision includes clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting, primary progressive and secondary progressive MS, and has added activity (i.e., formation of white matter lesions or clinical relapses) as a qualifier. This allows for the distinction between active and nonactive progression, which has been shown to be of clinical importance. We propose that a logical extension of this classification is the incorporation of additional key pathological processes, such as chronic perilesional inflammation, neuroaxonal degeneration, and remyelination. This will distinguish MS phenotypes that may present as clinically identical but are driven by different combinations of pathological processes. A more precise description of MS phenotypes will improve prognostication and personalized care as well as clinical trial design. Thus, our proposal provides an expanded framework for conceptualizing MS and for guiding development of biomarkers for monitoring activity along the main pathological axes in MS.
More Related Videos
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
05:44Author Spotlight: Creating a Versatile Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model Relevant for Both Male and Female Mice
Published on: October 13, 2023