Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retractions of publications in radiomics: An underestimated problem?

European radiology·2025
Same author

Correction: Növer et al. Prediction of Recurrence and Rupture Risk of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Machine Learning-Based Analysis. <i>Diagnostics</i> 2025, <i>15</i>, 2365.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Prediction of Recurrence and Rupture Risk of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Machine Learning-Based Analysis.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Benchmarking feature projection methods in radiomics.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Rethinking feature reproducibility in radiomics: the elephant in the dark.

European radiology experimental·2025
Same author

Detecting the left atrial appendage in CT localizers using deep learning.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
10:17

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics

Published on: January 8, 2018

13.3K

The effect of preprocessing filters on predictive performance in radiomics.

Aydin Demircioğlu1

  • 1Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. aydin.demircioglu@uk-essen.de.

European Radiology Experimental
|August 31, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Image preprocessing filters significantly improve radiomic model performance, enhancing personalized medicine. Applying these filters, despite increasing complexity, is recommended for radiomic studies to boost predictive accuracy.

Keywords:
Artificial intelligenceBenchmarkingMachine learningPrecision medicineRadiomics

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
10:17

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics

Published on: January 8, 2018

13.3K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.0K

Area of Science:

  • Radiomics
  • Machine Learning
  • Personalized Medicine

Background:

  • Radiomics, a noninvasive machine learning method, supports personalized medicine.
  • Common preprocessing filters (e.g., wavelet, Laplacian-of-Gaussian) are thought to improve predictive performance.
  • However, filters increase feature complexity and potential correlations, challenging machine learning models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of preprocessing filters on radiomic predictive performance.
  • To evaluate whether common preprocessing filters enhance or hinder machine learning model accuracy in radiomics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized seven public radiomic datasets.
  • Compared models with and without features preprocessed by eight different filters.
  • Employed five feature selection methods and five classifiers.
  • Measured performance using Area Under the Curve (AUC-ROC) with nested, stratified 10-fold cross-validation.

Main Results:

  • Applying all preprocessing filters significantly improved AUC-ROC by up to 0.08 (p = 0.024) compared to original features.
  • Some datasets showed non-significant decreases in AUC-ROC (-0.04 to -0.10).
  • Filter tuning further improved results by up to 0.1, with one dataset showing a significant improvement (p = 0.023).

Conclusions:

  • Image preprocessing filters significantly impact radiomic predictive performance.
  • The use of preprocessing filters is recommended in radiomic studies to potentially enhance predictive accuracy.