Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Reduced Complications after Arterial Reconnection in a Rat Model of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation
Published on: November 7, 2020
Improved outcomes following the implementation of a decompensated cirrhosis discharge bundle
Katherine Smethurst1, Jennifer Gallacher1, Laura Jopson1
1Liver Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Insights
A new care bundle for decompensated cirrhosis (DC) patients improved care consistency and reduced hospital readmissions. This standardized approach to managing DC patients shows promise for better patient outcomes and reduced healthcare variability.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Clinical Management
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Mortality from liver disease is rising, with inconsistent management of decompensated cirrhosis (DC) in the UK.
- Patients with DC require complex care post-discharge, leading to frequent early readmissions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a Decompensated Cirrhosis Discharge Bundle (DCDB) to optimize patient care.
- To evaluate the impact of implementing the DCDB on patient management and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A baseline review of DC patient management was conducted in 2017.
- The DCDB was developed and implemented, with impact assessed in two phases: paper (2018-2019) and electronic (2020-2021).
- Key clinical data were collected from patient discharge through three review cycles.
Main Results:
- Baseline care was suboptimal, with 12% of patients experiencing potentially avoidable 30-day readmissions.
- Post-DCDB implementation, improvements were noted in electrolyte monitoring and community alcohol follow-up.
- Potentially preventable readmissions decreased to 5% after the bundle's introduction.
Conclusions:
- A standardized care bundle for DC patients can improve management and outcomes.
- Wider adoption of the DCDB could reduce care variability and enhance patient recovery.
- The study highlights the effectiveness of structured discharge planning in managing complex liver disease patients.
Introduction:
Mortality from liver disease is increasing and management of decompensated cirrhosis (DC) is inconsistent across the UK. Patients with DC have complex medical needs when discharged from hospital and early readmissions are common. Our aims were: (1) to develop a Decompensated Cirrhosis Discharge Bundle (DCDB) to optimise ongoing care and (2) evaluate the impact of the DCDB.
Methods:
A baseline review of the management of patients with DC was conducted in Newcastle in 2017. The DCCB was developed and implemented in 2018. Impact of the DCDB was evaluated in two cycles, first a paper version (November 2018-October 2019) and then an electronic version (November 2020-March 2021). Key clinical data were collected from the time of discharge.
Results:
Overall, 192 patients (62% male; median age 55; median model for end-stage liver disease 17; 72% alcohol related) were reviewed in three cycles. At baseline, management was suboptimal, particularly ascites/diuretic management and provision of follow-up for alcohol misuse and 12% of patients had a potentially avoidable readmission within 30 days. After DCDB introduction, care improved across most domains, particularly electrolyte monitoring (p=0.012) and provision of community alcohol follow-up (p=0.026). Potentially preventable readmissions fell to 5% (p=0.055).
Conclusions:
Use of a care bundle for patients with DC can standardise care and improve patient management. If used more widely this could improve outcomes and reduce variability in care for patients with DC.
Related Concept Videos
Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:

