Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

6.0K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
6.0K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.6K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.6K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.2K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preparatory attentional templates in prefrontal and sensory cortex encode target-associated information.

eLife·2025
Same author

Neural mechanisms of credit assignment for delayed outcomes during contingent learning.

eLife·2025
Same author

Neural mechanisms of object prioritization in vision.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Neural mechanisms of credit assignment for delayed outcomes during contingent learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same author

Prefrontal Cortex Codes Representations of Target Identity and Feature Uncertainty.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Attentional priority is determined by predicted feature distributions.

Phillip P Witkowski1, Joy J Geng1

  • 1Center for Mind and Brain.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual attention adapts to changing target features by predicting future appearances. This study shows predictions, not just precise memories, guide attention by encoding feature likelihoods.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.1K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.1K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual attention is typically thought to rely on precise memories of target objects.
  • Real-world targets possess dynamic features that change over time, necessitating predictive mechanisms.
  • The influence of target feature predictions on attention and their representation in attentional templates remain underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how predictions about dynamic target features influence feature-based attention.
  • To determine how these predictions are encoded within the target template during visual search.
  • To examine the role of predicted feature distributions in setting attentional priority under uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1 involved 60 university students tracking target feature statistics and adapting attentional priority based on predictions.
  • Experiments 2a and 2b utilized 480 university students to analyze the encoding of predictions in target templates.
  • Behavioral experiments measured attentional guidance and feature representation during visual search tasks with dynamic targets.

Main Results:

  • Observers effectively track the statistical regularities of target features over time.
  • Attentional priority is dynamically adjusted based on predictions of future target feature distributions.
  • Predictions are encoded as likelihood distributions over possible features, independent of memory precision for specific cued items.

Conclusions:

  • This research demonstrates a novel mechanism for representing predicted feature distributions when target features are uncertain.
  • Predictions about dynamic target features are actively used to guide attentional priority during visual search.
  • Findings challenge traditional views of attention relying solely on precise object memories, highlighting the importance of predictive processing.