Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.1K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.1K
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

19.5K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
19.5K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

21.3K
Overview
21.3K
Exon Recombination02:32

Exon Recombination

3.7K
The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes. 
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
3.7K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

75.6K
Overview
75.6K
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

46.0K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
46.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lower Bounds on the Sample Complexity of Species Tree Estimation when Substitution Rates Vary Across Loci.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2025
Same author

Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Unrooted 3-Leaf Trees: An Analytic Solution for the CFN Model.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2024
Same author

QR-STAR: A Polynomial-Time Statistically Consistent Method for Rooting Species Trees Under the Coalescent.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2023
Same author

A stochastic Farris transform for genetic data under the multispecies coalescent with applications to data requirements.

Journal of mathematical biology·2022
Same author

Impossibility of Consistent Distance Estimation from Sequence Lengths Under the TKF91 Model.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2020
Same author

Generalized least squares can overcome the critical threshold in respondent-driven sampling.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 30, 2025

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

189

Inconsistency of Triplet-Based and Quartet-Based Species Tree Estimation under Intralocus Recombination.

Max Hill1, Sebastien Roch1

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology
|September 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Intralocus recombination creates an inconsistency zone for species tree estimation methods, even with abundant data. This zone can be amplified by differing recombination rates, impacting phylogenetic accuracy.

Keywords:
intralocus recombinationphylogeneticsspecies tree estimationstatistical consistency

More Related Videos

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase
12:02

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase

Published on: May 29, 2008

9.8K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 30, 2025

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

189
Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase
12:02

Molecular Evolution of the Tre Recombinase

Published on: May 29, 2008

9.8K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.4K

Area of Science:

  • Phylogenetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Population Genetics

Background:

  • Species tree estimation is crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships.
  • Coalescent-based methods are widely used for inferring species trees.
  • Intralocus recombination can complicate phylogenetic inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of intralocus recombination on summary coalescent-based species tree estimation methods.
  • To analytically and empirically characterize the conditions under which intralocus recombination leads to inaccurate species tree inference.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical derivation of inconsistency zones for triplet- and quartet-based methods.
  • Simulation studies to validate and explore the characterized inconsistency zones.

Main Results:

  • Intralocus recombination introduces an "inconsistency zone" where species tree inference is unreliable, irrespective of data amount.
  • Simulation results confirm the existence and extent of this inconsistency zone.
  • Differential recombination rates between taxa can exacerbate the effects of incomplete lineage sorting, leading to phylogenetic inconsistency.

Conclusions:

  • Summary coalescent methods using rooted triplets and related quartet-based methods are susceptible to intralocus recombination.
  • The identified inconsistency zone poses a significant challenge for accurate species tree reconstruction in the presence of intralocus recombination.
  • Understanding and accounting for intralocus recombination is essential for reliable phylogenetic inference.