Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

316
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
316
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

621
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
621
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

7.5K
Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and...
7.5K
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

12.1K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
12.1K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.8K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.8K
Plotting and Calibrating the Root Locus01:19

Plotting and Calibrating the Root Locus

169
Root loci often diverge as system poles shift from the real axis to the complex plane. Key points in this transition are the breakaway and break-in points, indicating where the root locus leaves and reenters the real axis. The branches of the root locus form an angle of 180/n degrees with the real axis, where n is the number of branches at a breakaway or break-in point.
The maximum gain occurs at the breakaway points between open-loop poles on the real axis, while the minimum gain is...
169

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single point estimation of a decision space.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Language experience predicts semantic priming of lexical decision.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2021
Same journal

The Rhythm Reproduction Task for children: A psychometric examination.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

QualGames: A Qualtrics implementation and a database of behavioral game theory tasks.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

PyLossless: A non-destructive EEG processing pipeline.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

"It makes sense to me": Examining data file column names in the visual cognitive literature.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.2K

d : Sensitivity at the optimal criterion location.

Harinder Aujla1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, R3B 2E9, Canada. h.aujla@uwinnipeg.ca.

Behavior Research Methods
|September 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new signal detection measure, d\, offers robust discriminability independent of response bias. This measure aligns with minimizing errors and addresses limitations of existing signal detection theory metrics.

Keywords:
Base ratesDecision strategySignal detectionUnequal variance

More Related Videos

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.2K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.2K
Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.2K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Signal detection theory (SDT) traditionally measures signal discriminability.
  • Standard measure d\ relies on strict assumptions (binormal distributions, equal variance/base rates).
  • Existing alternatives (da, d\) partially address violations of SDT assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce a new signal detection measure, d\.
  • Develop a measure robust to SDT assumption violations.
  • Ground discriminability in a minimize error count (MEC) strategy.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a novel signal detection measure, d\.
  • Conducted simulations to compare d\ with existing measures (da, d\).
  • Examined implications for bias metrics (β, c) at optimal criteria.

Main Results:

  • d\ is robust to violations of standard SDT assumptions.
  • d\ remains consistent across varying response biases.
  • d\ reflects discriminability changes related to base rates, unlike da.
  • d\ aligns with d\ when optimizing for MEC but is criterion-independent.

Conclusions:

  • d\ provides a more robust and consistent measure of signal discriminability.
  • The new measure is grounded in an observer's error minimization strategy.
  • d\ offers advantages over existing measures, particularly when SDT assumptions are violated.