Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025
Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Clinical Efficacy, Survival, and Adverse Reaction Evaluation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Advanced Gastric
Ping Zhang1, Xiaomeng Zhang2, Na Zhu1
1Department of Medical Oncology, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai 264003, China.
Objective:
To systematically assess the clinical effect and survival time of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) in advanced gastric cancer (GC) and adverse reactions to provide evidence-based medicine for its enhancement and adoption.
Methods:
PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge Network database (CNKI), China VIP database, Wanfang database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) online database were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of immuno-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced GC therapy. Retrieval time was limited to the period from the date the database was established to present. Separately, two researchers gathered the data. Statistical software RevMan5.4 was used to estimate bias risk according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.3 standard.
Results:
The computer database retrieved 1723 articles, and 465 articles were eliminated when repeated studies were removed. After screening the titles and abstracts of 287 articles, 124 articles were contained after eliminating irrelevant studies, reviews, case reports, and no control literature. After carefully reading 108 studies with insufficient data and no major outcome markers, 6 RCTs were eventually contained. 4 articles compared the levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) after treatment. The result indicated that the levels of serum CEA and CA199 in the study group were notably lower, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The immune function indexes after treatment were compared, suggesting that the improvement of immune function indexes in the study group was notably better, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Three clinical trials reported the median progression-free survival (PFS). The PFS of the study group was notably longer after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The occurrence of adverse reactions after treatment was analyzed by meat, and all the literatures were analyzed. No notable differences were observed in the incidence of adverse reactions.
Conclusion:
ICIs associated with chemotherapy is effective when treating GC, which can effectively promote the disease control rate of patients, enhance immune function, reduce the level of tumor markers, and prolong survival time. The safety is controllable, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice. However, more studies and follow-up with higher methodological quality and longer intervention time are needed to further verify it.
