Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

A Reproducible Intensive Care Unit-Oriented Endotoxin Model in Rats
Published on: February 20, 2021
Septic shock 3.0 criteria application in severe COVID-19 patients: An unattended sepsis population with high
José Pedro Cidade1, L M Coelho2, Vasco Costa3
1Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa 1449-005, Portugal. zencidade@gmail.com.
Insights
Severe COVID-19 patients requiring vasopressors but lacking hyperlactatemia have high mortality risk. Current Sepsis 3.0 criteria may miss these critical cases, necessitating broader recognition for timely organ support.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Pulmonology
Background:
- Severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often leads to septic shock and organ dysfunction, requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission and support.
- Early identification of patients needing organ support is crucial for improving outcomes.
- The absence of hyperlactatemia in some severe COVID-19 patients may lead to underestimation of illness severity and mortality risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the proportion of severe COVID-19 patients needing vasopressor support, with and without hyperlactatemia.
- To describe the clinical outcomes and mortality associated with these patient groups.
- To evaluate the applicability of Sepsis 3.0 criteria in severe COVID-19.
Main Methods:
- A single-center prospective cohort study included adult ICU patients with COVID-19.
- Patients were categorized into: Sepsis group, Vasoplegic Shock group (hypotension and vasopressors without hyperlactatemia), and Septic Shock 3.0 group (both criteria).
- COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by clinical, radiological, and RT-PCR testing.
Main Results:
- 118 patients were analyzed, with significant differences in SOFA scores and ICU length of stay between groups.
- Mortality was higher in the Vasoplegic Shock and Septic Shock 3.0 groups compared to the Sepsis group (P < 0.001).
- Maximum vasopressor dose and serum lactate levels were key predictors of mortality.
Conclusions:
- Sepsis 3.0 criteria may exclude a significant proportion of severe COVID-19 patients with high mortality risk.
- These patients, particularly those with vasoplegic shock without hyperlactatemia, require similar attention and organ support.
- Clinical criteria for recognizing severe COVID-19 and guiding organ support need refinement beyond current Sepsis 3.0 guidelines.
Background:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be associated with life-threatening organ dysfunction due to septic shock, frequently requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respiratory and vasopressor support. Therefore, clear clinical criteria are pivotal for early recognition of patients more likely to need prompt organ support. Although most patients with severe COVID-19 meet the Sepsis-3.0 criteria for septic shock, it has been increasingly recognized that hyperlactatemia is frequently absent, possibly leading to an underestimation of illness severity and mortality risk.
Aim:
To identify the proportion of severe COVID-19 patients with vasopressor support requirements, with and without hyperlactatemia, and describe their clinical outcomes and mortality.
Methods:
We performed a single-center prospective cohort study. All adult patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 were included in the analysis and were further divided into three groups: Sepsis group, without both criteria; Vasoplegic Shock group, with persistent hypotension and vasopressor support without hyperlactatemia; and Septic Shock 3.0 group, with both criteria. COVID-19 was diagnosed using clinical and radiologic criteria with a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive RT-PCR test.
Results:
118 patients (mean age 63 years, 87% males) were included in the analysis (n = 51 Sepsis group, n = 26 Vasoplegic Shock group, and n = 41 Septic Shock 3.0 group). SOFA score at ICU admission and ICU length of stay were different between the groups (P < 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the Vasoplegic Shock and Septic Shock 3.0 groups when compared with the Sepsis group (P < 0.001) without a significant difference between the former two groups (P = 0.713). The log rank tests of Kaplan-Meier survival curves were also different (P = 0.007). Ventilator-free days and vasopressor-free days were different between the Sepsis vs Vasoplegic Shock and Septic Shock 3.0 groups (both P < 0.001), and similar in the last two groups (P = 0.128 and P = 0.133, respectively). Logistic regression identified the maximum dose of vasopressor therapy used (AOR 1.046; 95%CI: 1.012-1.082, P = 0.008) and serum lactate level (AOR 1.542; 95%CI: 1.055-2.255, P = 0.02) as the major explanatory variables of mortality rates (R 2 0.79).
Conclusion:
In severe COVID-19 patients, the Sepsis 3.0 criteria of septic shock may exclude approximately one third of patients with a similarly high risk of a poor outcome and mortality rate, which should be equally addressed.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:

