Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025
Author Spotlight: Ultrasound-Guided Needle Release Combined with Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Supinator Syndrome
Published on: May 26, 2023
Outcomes of Continued Intensive Conservative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Release for
Tarun Goyal1, Arghya Kundu Choudhury2, Souvik Paul2
1Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab 151001 India.
Introduction:
There is no consensus on treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (RLE). This is a prospective, non-randomized, interventional study comparing pain scores and functional outcomes between arthroscopic extensor carpi radialis brevis release and continued intensive conservative treatment.
Materials And Methods:
The study compared two groups: Group 1, consisting of 25 patients undergoing continued conservative treatment for 24 months, and Group 2, consisting of 25 patients undergoing arthroscopic extensor carpi radialis brevis release with decortication (ARD). VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) score for lateral elbow pain at rest and after routine daily activities were compared at 6 weeks, 24 weeks, 12 months and 24 months. Functional outcomes were compared with grip strength, and patients reported functional outcome scores, pre-intervention and 24 months post-intervention.
Results:
There was a significant improvement in VAS scores for pain, functional outcome scores, and grip strength in both the groups post-intervention (P < 0.05). VAS scores for pain at rest in both the groups were significantly better after the interventions, at all follow-up durations (P < 0.001). VAS scores for pain after routine daily activities were significantly better in group 2 at 24 weeks (P = 0.002) and afterward (P < 0.001). Group 2 had significantly better functional outcome scores at 24 months (P < 0.001) though the difference in grip strength was not statistically significant (P = 0.121).
Conclusion:
The present study shows favourable functional outcomes and pain scores of ARD compared to continued intensive conservative treatment for RLE.
Level Of Study:
II, Non-randomized comparative study.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00649-w.
