Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.7K
Does intermittent theta burst stimulation improve working memory capacity? A randomized controlled cross-over
Yali Feng1, Jack Jiaqi Zhang2, Jiaqi Zhu1
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Behavioural Brain Research
|September 2, 2022
Summary
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) applied to the left or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex did not enhance working memory in healthy adults. The study found no significant memory benefits beyond practice effects from iTBS.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuromodulation
Background:
- Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is hypothesized to enhance memory by inducing long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).
- The hemispheric differences in iTBS effects on working memory in healthy adults remain under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of iTBS on the left (LDLPFC) and right (RDLPFC) dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on working memory performance in healthy adults.
- To determine if unilateral iTBS over the DLPFC yields memory-enhancing effects.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, cross-over design was employed with 31 healthy, right-hand dominant adults.
- Participants received single sessions of iTBS to the LDLPFC, RDLPFC, and sham stimulation across three visits, separated by one-week intervals.
- Working memory capacity was assessed using 2-back and 3-back tasks before and immediately after each stimulation session.
Main Results:
- Significant time effects were observed for overall accuracy in both 2-back (p=0.013) and 3-back tasks (p=0.027), and for reaction time in the 3-back task (p=0.021).
- An increase in correction rejections was noted for the 2-back task (p=0.009).
- No significant time-by-group interaction effects were found, indicating no differential impact of iTBS location.
Conclusions:
- A single session of iTBS applied to either the RDLPFC or LDLPFC did not produce additional memory-enhancing effects in healthy adults.
- Observed improvements in working memory performance were attributable to practice effects rather than iTBS intervention.

